SockMonster
Well-known member
MAY I have
Please may I have..
MAY I have
How many more times if we had HAVE not if we had OF
Even that is not right. As I understand it, it was purely a point of principle, on Bloom's part:
1. Gus scouted VVD extensively, and told the club to get him.
2. The club negotiated a deal to buy him (The figures are not important, but it was about €2.5m), and VVD was keen to sign.
3. Groeningen agreed the price, but decided that because they were fighting against relegation, that they would not allow the deal to proceed until the end of the season. The clubs shook hands on that arrangement.
4. By the end of the season, VVD had attracted a little more attention, including from Celtic, so feeling they now had a slightly stronger hand to play, Groeningen told the Albion the player was still their's but the price had gone up to €3m.
5. Tony Bloom told them they'd agreed a deal, and if they were not going to honour it, he was not doing business with them.
So, nothing at all to do with not having the money, norwith not feeling the deal represented good value - just a matter of principle. A shame we missed out on a great player, but personally I'm with Bloom - good on him.
Only very briefly, half a season with us, and then another dozen games or so for Southampton. not at Premier League level either.
Even that is not right. As I understand it, it was purely a point of principle, on Bloom's part:
1. Gus scouted VVD extensively, and told the club to get him.
2. The club negotiated a deal to buy him (The figures are not important, but it was about €2.5m), and VVD was keen to sign.
3. Groeningen agreed the price, but decided that because they were fighting against relegation, that they would not allow the deal to proceed until the end of the season. The clubs shook hands on that arrangement.
4. By the end of the season, VVD had attracted a little more attention, including from Celtic, so feeling they now had a slightly stronger hand to play, Groeningen told the Albion the player was still their's but the price had gone up to €3m.
5. Tony Bloom told them they'd agreed a deal, and if they were not going to honour it, he was not doing business with them.
So, nothing at all to do with not having the money, norwith not feeling the deal represented good value - just a matter of principle. A shame we missed out on a great player, but personally I'm with Bloom - good on him.
In fact...
Excuse me. I'm terribly sorry to bother you. Please may I have......
I think we are fighting a losing battle.
There is a whole generation who really missed out on grammar education. They also say can I get rather than can I have.
Pet hate and hurts my eyes - bloody Facebook generation who are lazy *****
I get highly qualified graduates writing reports with 'could of' and 'would of' in them...................does my ****ing head in.
How many more times if we had HAVE not if we had OF
How many more times if we had HAVE not if we had OF
Perhaps it's time for Bozza to apply a Mike Dean type solution? Any attempts to type should of, would of, could or had of would be autocorrected so that the 'of' appears as 'have' - a win/win situation - those of us who are rightly annoyed by the appalling grammar of 'should of' would be happy, and the more grammatically ignorant would be gently but firmly educated.Pet hate and hurts my eyes - bloody Facebook generation who are lazy *****
Perhaps it's time for Bozza to apply a The Complete And Utter Shyster type solution? Any attempts to type should of, would of, could or had of would be autocorrected so that the 'of' appears as 'have' - a win/win situation - those of us who are rightly annoyed by the appalling grammar of 'should of' would be happy, and the more grammatically ignorant would be gently but firmly educated.
Simples.
Innit.............
and isn't Russian
There could of course exist situations where this rule is not appropriate...
Hmmm ............. good point. The dilemma could, of course, be avoided by the appropriate use of commas.