That was quick Harry
I wonder who the father is?
Does Hewitt have an alibi?
Really? Has anyone told him?Yes, he's dead
The timing is obviously all wrong but can you imagine how many people would be sent over the edge by a royal marrying a girl of mixed race and getting her pregnant out of wedlock?
The timing is obviously all wrong but can you imagine how many people would be sent over the edge by a royal marrying a girl of mixed race and getting her pregnant out of wedlock?
Really? It is hard to imagine why they would give a stuff but not that such people exist. There are some thoroughly unpleasant people out there.Actually, it is quite hard to imagine anyone would give a stuff. Good luck to them.
Paris Match magazine 1950 on the left, featuring the Duke of Edinburgh. Duke of Sussex on the right.
View attachment 101306
Actually, it is quite hard to imagine anyone would give a stuff. Good luck to them.
Are there any other pictures available of the Duke looking remotely like "his" grandson? I only ask because otherwise a) if you google this, you get ONE image and that is from the Mail, and b) this strikes me as an example of the establishment in action - where key people in the media circle the wagons in order to protect their knighthoods. Not unlike that wedding last week, where that unfortunate incident with the wind on the steps was barely reported. By the way, that wedding cost the British taxpayer £2m in policing costs, and all because Prince Andrew (spit) decided he wanted her to have a wedding "befitting a grand daughter of the queen". You can bet that particular indulgence won't be included in the 16p a year that it supposedly costs the tax payer to prop up these leeches.Paris Match magazine 1950 on the left, featuring the Duke of Edinburgh. Duke of Sussex on the right.
Are there any other pictures available of the Duke looking remotely like "his" grandson? I only ask because otherwise a) if you google this, you get ONE image and that is from the Mail, and b) this strikes me as an example of the establishment in action - where key people in the media circle the wagons in order to protect their knighthoods. Not unlike that wedding last week, where that unfortunate incident with the wind on the steps was barely reported. By the way, that wedding cost the British taxpayer £2m in policing costs, and all because Prince Andrew (spit) decided he wanted her to have a wedding "befitting a grand daughter of the queen". You can bet that particular indulgence won't be included in the 16p a year that it supposedly costs the tax payer to prop up these leeches.
Policing Trump? Good grief, that is apples and oranges. The one-off cost of policing the safety of the most powerful leader of the western world against a minor royal that nobody cares about except her immediate family. A more relevant example would be the cost of policing last week's wedding to the cost of policing yours or my daughter's wedding. And then you quickly realise that Prince Andrew remains a shining example of why the Royal family in it's current guise should not be tolerated.65p, dear Simster.
£18M cost of policing Trump over here. I know which I'd rather have.
You won't get the free shirt then. Do it now and then you won't have that issue [emoji3]Sign it up for Junior seagulls? Or wait until a few weeks after their 7th birthday?
Surely should be Prince Chris Glenn Tony Barber-Windsor.