The quotas are often worth more than the boat.Not a business model I'd embrace.
I wonder how it works for a fisherman who own a boat and wants to pass it on to his son?
Would he be exempt if his boat was worth less than a million quid?
The quotas are often worth more than the boat.Not a business model I'd embrace.
I wonder how it works for a fisherman who own a boat and wants to pass it on to his son?
Would he be exempt if his boat was worth less than a million quid?
Team HarryI'm with the farmers on this.
I'm not saying it would be easy, but I also don't think a strategic farming future for the country should rely on farming being mainly an inheritance based succession. If we want young and aspiring farmers, then owning your own farm and business that isn't inherited has to be an aspiration.What about somewhere to live ? Equipment ? Livestock ? Vehicles ?
…..and then when you’ve got all that, 60-80 hours a week, on call 24/7 to make - in most cases - very little money.
OK so people want to target rich bastards like Clarkson, fine but why set such a low mark of £1m, why not just target the very rich?Precisely the reason so many estates have been bought by your Clarkson's with a view of avoiding IHT. I don't remember anyone posting that the IHT exception has created the exact same concern you have for food security. Farmer sells to investor for IHT saving purposes vs farmer sells because of IHT liability. Same difference if you're concerned about retention of farms from investors and big business.
You are a bit too left wing for mePilling more on income tax is a terrible idea. There is a complete inbalance between earned income and unearned income and this for me is a step in the right direction. I hope there are more measures to follow and that unltimately tax paid on income will begin to fall.
Deference is still at our heart....A lot of people woke up and took the blue pill again I see.
Isn’t the problem here that these are rural farmers, not accountants and businesspeople? They know crops, and soil, and tractors and cows and work extremely long hours for very low pay, when taken as an hourly rate.Using a trust for succession planning in a farming family can be a practical and effective way to ensure the farm’s continued success and the fair distribution of assets among heirs.
They better not delay anyone's hospital appointment or that will be 3 years...Has anyone checked the tractors in Westminster at the moment to make sure they're not using red diesel, given that wouldn't be allowed and they'd be avoiding yet more tax
Nice theory but really not sure how we get say a 17 year old off to agricultural college to learn how to run a farm, then work on one earning enough - on what are crap wages - to save up a £50k (absolute minimum) deposit to buy his own farm (if there’s any lender that would even consider giving him a mortgage anyway). If it’s not in your family you aren’t going to own one.I'm not saying it would be easy, but I also don't think a strategic farming future for the country should rely on farming being mainly an inheritance based succession. If we want young and aspiring farmers, then owning your own farm and business that isn't inherited has to be an aspiration.
How did all these farmers survive up until 1992 when the millionaires loophole was introduced?Isn’t the problem here that these are rural farmers, not accountants and businesspeople? They know crops, and soil, and tractors and cows and work extremely long hours for very low pay, when taken as an hourly rate.
Most farms have been in families for generations, which started as a simple plot of land but have been cultivated and developed over a long period of time by families.
I think in farming anyone under the age of 45 can be considered a 'young farmer'. Some will potentially run successful farming consultancy or management businesses and perhaps finally own a farm.Nice theory but really not sure how we get say a 17 year old off to agricultural college to learn how to run a farm, then work on one earning enough - on what are crap wages - to save up a £50k (absolute minimum) deposit to buy his own farm (if there’s any lender that would even consider giving him a mortgage anyway). If it’s not in your family you aren’t going to own one.
I need to read more around this but it feels a bit like a sledgehammer to crack a nut - trying to capture the rich/VC lot who have been buying farms as a tax avoidance strategy but hitting simple farmers at the same time.
This. Or farms are bought up increasingly by large corporations which will decrease variety and increase the public being fleeced by those said corporations.on the one hand the farmers may be over playing it.
on the other hand it's a crass policy to deal with one problem, that has consequences for thousands of farmers, and the original issue should have been dealt with better directly.
and it is thousands, government casually dismissing 500 farms a year affected are overlooking the long term and the families involved. also it's £1m value, there is no spouse transfer of this allowance. a relativly modest farm ~100 acres would be included.
what will happen is farms get trimmed smaller to avoid the IHT, making some less viable. a lot of small holding perhaps for weekend farmers, or rewilding while we import more food?
I think that might be a bit of a myth.FFS - You guys voted Brexit on mass,
What a load of uninformed twaddle!Nicky Campbell's phone-in this morning is on farming.
There is a bus load of farmers on their way to London to protest against the introduction of some inheritance tax for farmers.
Crikey, what an entitled bunch.
They seem to have lived a simple life, with 'very little income' (some saying a few tens of thousands of pounds profit a year), but if their farm is worth more than three million pounds then, as a married couple, they will be liable to 20% inheritance tax (half what you and I pay), with this change coming in a couple of years, if they 'do nothing' to mitigate against the change.
Apparently farming is 'not a commercial business'. This means it is some sort of vocation, with little reward, that is offset by not having to think about anything, such as investment, saving, pensions and money in general.
And it's not fair.
Well, diddums.
A caller has pointed out that all that is needed is planning, but the farmers seem to think they shouldn't have to plan or think. OK, mates.
Final bleat: 'the government are taking away our way of life'. What did I do with that small onion I had in my pocket?