bhaexpress said:The trouble is who would do their menial jobs ? There just aren't enough Poles go round.
Surely that big old socialist LI wouldn't mind doing a bit of road sweeping as long as it's for the good of the people.
bhaexpress said:The trouble is who would do their menial jobs ? There just aren't enough Poles go round.
Les Biehn said:Surely that big old socialist LI wouldn't mind doing a bit of road sweeping as long as it's for the good of the people.
Man of Harveys said:Why should MPs donate whilst the virtual monopoly that is Tesco is making a million a minute or whatever ridiculous amount it is?
desprateseagull said:why would a company need loans, if the 'savers' were paying up front for several months? all that could earn a decent interest..
tedebear said:The problem is that the money deposited into the scheme was being used by the company to fund other purchases, in this case a Book Company which then went bust!
Farepak was a company which was owned by EHR, EHR decided to buy another company called DMG in 2000, they used the deposits from Farepak to buy the company, and later took out a loan with HBOS to cover the money they had "borrowed" from the pool of deposits. DMG made disastrous losses and was later sold for just £5m. HBOS called in the debt by seizing £36m of Farepak customers' money which they had saved for Christmas hampers and gifts.
and thats it in a nutshell...
The money isn't protected like savings as it is seen as pre-payment for goods which haven't yet been dispatched...
Buzzer said:even though it's a glorified savings scheme for the Lidl/Trisha generation.
Why is it that the very poorest in society get the least protection.
bhaexpress said:True, if they could afford condoms there wouldn't be so many of them.