balloonboy said:Look it's now gone midday and nothing's bl00dy well happened, apart from the fact that I couldn't log onto NSC for about ten mins, presumably due to everyone else trying to confirm that NOTHING IS HAPPENING.
And when I finally get on NSC, all I find out is that Peter Crouch is signing for Southampton.
bhafc99 said:“On tourism and recreation I am not proposing to accept the recommendation that international attractions with specific catchment area requirements should be exempt from a sequential test to direct major development of that type into regional growth areas or priority areas for economic regeneration. I consider that the guidance contains enough safeguards to allow development of this type to locate elsewhere should such locations prove unsuitable.”
The stadium would be an 'international attraction'. We have 'specific catchment area requirements'. Beyond that it rapidly descends into 'clear as mud' civil service-speak...
If there is anything relevant to the Falmer case, it is Prescott's decision that a sequential site search is required for ALL major developments, without exception.bhafc99 said:There's a press release dated yesterday on the ODPM site (http://www.odpm.gov.uk/pns/DisplayPN.cgi?pn_id=2004_0160), which is about energy, tourism, and related sport and recreation facilities in the south east. Though it's not directly linked to Falmer, I've been reading and re-reading the following trying to decide if there's any relevance, cryptic or otherwise, to us.
Or am I just getting paranoid?
“On tourism and recreation I am not proposing to accept the recommendation that international attractions with specific catchment area requirements should be exempt from a sequential test to direct major development of that type into regional growth areas or priority areas for economic regeneration. I consider that the guidance contains enough safeguards to allow development of this type to locate elsewhere should such locations prove unsuitable.”
The stadium would be an 'international attraction'. We have 'specific catchment area requirements'. Beyond that it rapidly descends into 'clear as mud' civil service-speak...