portlock seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,779
- Thread starter
- #41
My letter, for what it's worth - get copying!
Mr John Prescott,
Deputy Prime Minister
26 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2WH
February 4th, 2004
Dear Mr Prescott,
REF: Falmer Community Stadium Planning Application in Brighton & Hove
I am writing with frustration and anger at the local plan inspector’s report tonight.
COMPELLING FACTS HAVE SIMPLY BEEN CASUALLY DISMISSED. HOW CAN ANY DEMOCRACTIC DECISION BE MADE FAIRLY BY SUCH AN INJUSTICE?
The timing of the report is appalling. Your final decision is imminent after YEARS of tireless hard work and campaigning by thousands of people, not to mention millions of pounds of precious resources, dedicated to this application. In its support; Brighton and Hove City Council have fully endorsed it, the largest petition in the county’s history has been hand delivered to you, a local referendum was found in its favour by a large majority…What is compelling is the overwhelming support the application has received at a local level. Tonight this appears to have been breezed over, making the Public Enquiry a near farce. The report is nothing short of scandalous and is outraging tens of thousands of people like myself, who yet again write to express our views.
How many more letters must we write to convince central government that the majority of people in the city of Brighton and Hove and Sussex want a 21st century sports facility and the enormous benefits it will inject into the local area; both social and economic?
· The Inspectorate’s report ignores the very real difficulties of finding such a suitable site in the conurbations area. An exhausted search has already been conducted over the past 4 years. Falmer is the only location.
· It does not reflect the overwhelming support for the stadium project at Falmer and the immensely detailed consultation process undertaken before site selection
· It does not reflect Brighton and Hove Albion’s need for a new stadium nor the clubs importance both nationally and locally
· It ignores the huge number of jobs and opportunities for education and skills training the project would develop
· It ignores the applications attention to pioneer sustainable transport to access the site
· It ignores the FACT that Falmer has the least environmental impact of any of the initially proposed sites.
I hope at this late hour in the application’s process, that such an unfair and undemocratic report does not influence your better judgement. It would be a travesty if it did Mr Prescott.
Yours sincerely,
Mr John Prescott,
Deputy Prime Minister
26 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2WH
February 4th, 2004
Dear Mr Prescott,
REF: Falmer Community Stadium Planning Application in Brighton & Hove
I am writing with frustration and anger at the local plan inspector’s report tonight.
COMPELLING FACTS HAVE SIMPLY BEEN CASUALLY DISMISSED. HOW CAN ANY DEMOCRACTIC DECISION BE MADE FAIRLY BY SUCH AN INJUSTICE?
The timing of the report is appalling. Your final decision is imminent after YEARS of tireless hard work and campaigning by thousands of people, not to mention millions of pounds of precious resources, dedicated to this application. In its support; Brighton and Hove City Council have fully endorsed it, the largest petition in the county’s history has been hand delivered to you, a local referendum was found in its favour by a large majority…What is compelling is the overwhelming support the application has received at a local level. Tonight this appears to have been breezed over, making the Public Enquiry a near farce. The report is nothing short of scandalous and is outraging tens of thousands of people like myself, who yet again write to express our views.
How many more letters must we write to convince central government that the majority of people in the city of Brighton and Hove and Sussex want a 21st century sports facility and the enormous benefits it will inject into the local area; both social and economic?
· The Inspectorate’s report ignores the very real difficulties of finding such a suitable site in the conurbations area. An exhausted search has already been conducted over the past 4 years. Falmer is the only location.
· It does not reflect the overwhelming support for the stadium project at Falmer and the immensely detailed consultation process undertaken before site selection
· It does not reflect Brighton and Hove Albion’s need for a new stadium nor the clubs importance both nationally and locally
· It ignores the huge number of jobs and opportunities for education and skills training the project would develop
· It ignores the applications attention to pioneer sustainable transport to access the site
· It ignores the FACT that Falmer has the least environmental impact of any of the initially proposed sites.
I hope at this late hour in the application’s process, that such an unfair and undemocratic report does not influence your better judgement. It would be a travesty if it did Mr Prescott.
Yours sincerely,