Stick the rest of the cladding round the sides, put the chairs in, lay the grass and we're done.
If only it were that simple!!
Stick the rest of the cladding round the sides, put the chairs in, lay the grass and we're done.
These are brilliant. Like the last especially showing the pitch surrounds and the 'chalk pitch'.
Doesn't it just look so much better than, say, St Mary's?
Doesn't it just look so much better than, say, St Mary's?
World cup stadium St Marys? Youre probably right, but then ours is 10 years old. Remarkable how a stadium looks a bit shitter after half a dozen years. Anyone passing The Den on the way up to London Bridge would testify to that.
Bad example.
Not sure I agree. I think new stadiums that are built with a bit of class, architectural beauty and difference to others can stand the test of time. Huddersfield is a perfect example, that's still a lovely ground and must be 15 years old now. Same with Bolton. On the other hand, the cheap ones like Middlesbrough, Southampton, Leicester, Stoke etc look bollocks.
World cup stadium St Marys? Youre probably right, but then ours is 10 years old. Remarkable how a stadium looks a bit shitter after half a dozen years. Anyone passing The Den on the way up to London Bridge would testify to that.
World cup stadium St Marys? Youre probably right, but then ours is 10 years old. Remarkable how a stadium looks a bit shitter after half a dozen years. Anyone passing The Den on the way up to London Bridge would testify to that.
Probably but my point is our place looked nicer when it was first opened.
which world cup is that then?
...without of course the luxury of only needing a max of 22,000 fans.
.. both not requiring the luxury of hosting a Premier League team.
Not seen the cup draw then.
and in the words of someone else
'the distance shots prove exactly what we told the planners was correct that you will hardly notice the stadium in the rolling downs'