Fcuking outrageous... fcuking government might want to join the rest of the world... 10 years to make a simple fcuking decision, and they want more time! Try doing that in business... you would be shown the door in seconds...
Send our boys and girls into an illegal war and give all our goodies away to those nasty Belgiques over a pint and a pie though,Fcuking outrageous... fcuking government might want to join the rest of the world... 10 years to make a simple fcuking decision, and they want more time! Try doing that in business... you would be shown the door in seconds...
No she has only been in post for five days and she will be swamped with information from civil servants on every subject that her portfolio cover so hardly suprising that she is hardly likely to be in a position to give such an important decision her full consideration by the 9th (by which time she will only have been in place for a working week). Up until Monday she had no interest in planning whatsoever. Expecting her to make an announcement of this magnitude based on nothing more than a written submission is, quite frankly, expecting a bit much. If she was opening a school fair enough, but this is a biggy and she might even have asked to be briefed in person by civil servants over it, which takes arranging.
Alternatively it may be so far down her agenda that there are more important things for her to be getting on with and she is not likely to meet the previous deadline of the 9th and so it has been put back.
If its anything like my department all decisions and arrangements that were in place on Friday are now past history and up for review by the replacement. She is a brand new Secretary of State so will be feeling her way in a bit at the moment. She is still trying to get up to speed with ALL the issues covered by her Department (of which this is only one)
what a f***ing mess
Perhaps if her spineless c*nting government wasn't so soft on these f***ing nutters the ginger shit bag wouldn't have to keep having these sloworm meetings,She has also been involved in the Cobra meetings resulting from the attempted bombings, so I think she has quite a lot on her mind at the mo (not that I want to make excuses for her, I don't really like her, but that may change on the 25th)
Only five years actually - the planning appliucation was called in on 9 August 2002
No she has only been in post for five days and she will be swamped with information from civil servants on every subject that her portfolio cover so hardly suprising that she is hardly likely to be in a position to give such an important decision her full consideration by the 9th (by which time she will only have been in place for a working week). Up until Monday she had no interest in planning whatsoever. Expecting her to make an announcement of this magnitude based on nothing more than a written submission is, quite frankly, expecting a bit much. If she was opening a school fair enough, but this is a biggy and she might even have asked to be briefed in person by civil servants over it, which takes arranging.
Alternatively it may be so far down her agenda that there are more important things for her to be getting on with and she is not likely to meet the previous deadline of the 9th and so it has been put back.
If its anything like my department all decisions and arrangements that were in place on Friday are now past history and up for review by the replacement. She is a brand new Secretary of State so will be feeling her way in a bit at the moment. She is still trying to get up to speed with ALL the issues covered by her Department (of which this is only one)
The way I see it is this, do we want an announcement on the 9th July that can be immediately challenged on the very reasonable grounds that a new Secretary of State couldn't possibly have been informed enough to make OR do we want to wait a couple of weeks longer for a decision that shuts the NIMBY fuckers up ONCE AND FOR ALL?
I know which option I'd prefer.
Which will surely mean they will be doubly careful this time not to make any mistakes?But the same kind of things were said last time; "it has taken time, but the decision will be 100% watertight"... as it turned out, it took fcuking ages, and the rationale was not watertight...