Lifelong Supporter
Well-known member
We were improving then, year on year!Under Potter we finished 16th, 15th and 9th.
We were improving then, year on year!Under Potter we finished 16th, 15th and 9th.
True, I thought he could be our Arsene Wenger. It had all started to go so well. He had had the backing of TB during the tough times and it seemed to be all coming together before he decided to abandon the project for greed.We were improving then, year on year!
TBF the 9th was unconvincing. Think we could've still finished 13th going into the final half of the season. Still an improvement though.We were improving then, year on year!
Yeah, we finish where we finish so it can't be argued with but that final match put a lovely sheen on a season where we could very easily have finished bottom half again. Not a criticism of GP by the way but just a reminder how small the margins are.TBF the 9th was unconvincing. Think we could've still finished 13th going into the final half of the season. Still an improvement though.
Yes. But stating the obvious here, I think the club obviously thought the players we brought in were further ahead in their development (read: better) than FacundoWhat I find odd about the Buananotte situation is that he had already had his bedding in time getting used to a new country and the Premier League and we shipped him out on loan to make space for players that need a bedding in period.
We were improving then, year on year!
TBF the 9th was unconvincing. Think we could've still finished 13th going into the final half of the season. Still an improvement though.
and therein lies the problem....They could have in the window although it looks like another FH doesn’t rate.
The way RVN scapegoat him I’m surprised we left him there to have a few appearances off the bench. That wasn’t the idea he was starting and playing well.and therein lies the problem....
I agree , can't be good for his development and the replacements are either not fit or so far not an improvement.The way RVN scapegoat him I’m surprised we left him there to have a few appearances off the bench. That wasn’t the idea he was starting and playing well.
Agree would rather him than Gruda or MO who looks a bit lost at this level. Surprised we took a punt from the SPL.I agree , can't be good for his development and the replacements are either not fit or so far not an improvement.
The way RVN scapegoat him I’m surprised we left him there to have a few appearances off the bench. That wasn’t the idea he was starting and playing well.
I agree , can't be good for his development and the replacements are either not fit or so far not an improvement.
good post. if its a contract between two clubs then I would have thought it was renegotiable if both clubs agree. I wonder how much money is involved , I would think it was peanuts compared to what we spent in the summer. I am a big fan of Buonanotte, and think he is of more use to us now than O'Riley or Gruda .Reports said we couldn't recall him as the recall clause could only be activated if he'd not played a certain number of games/minutes and he'd surpassed that.
However with RVN moaning about wanting another loan and he couldn't because of the 2 player rule, I don't know why Leicester didn't approach us to mutually terminate the loan. Maybe there were some financial penalties for doing so and they couldn't afford to send him back.
I do wonder going forward if we might build a change of manager clause into loan agreements so if a player does surpass the required number of games/mins it resets if the club changes manager and they have to play a certain new number based on how many games remain between the change and the transfer window.
MO looks like a player who would do well in a good team where there is a strong midfield behind him but really don't see him with a physical presence in midfield. It might be me but from the dizzy heights of WSU he runs like dean wilkins, its the way h holds his arms I think.Agree would rather him than Gruda or MO who looks a bit lost at this level. Surprised we took a punt from the SPL.
Isn’t he really another no.10?MO looks like a player who would do well in a good team where there is a strong midfield behind him but really don't see him with a physical presence in midfield. It might be me but from the dizzy heights of WSU he runs like dean wilkins, it’s the way h holds his arms I think.
So what? Whether you were convinced or not we finished in the top half of the PL/Division 1 for the first time ever. Well done the team; well done Potter.TBF the 9th was unconvincing. Think we could've still finished 13th going into the final half of the season. Still an improvement though.
He looks like a player who would do well in the SPL ......MO looks like a player who would do well in a good team where there is a strong midfield behind him but really don't see him with a physical presence in midfield. It might be me but from the dizzy heights of WSU he runs like dean wilkins, its the way h holds his arms I think.
By the end of Potter’s time we had developed into a really good team. 30 points from Potter’s final 14 league games (end of one season start of the next).TBF the 9th was unconvincing. Think we could've still finished 13th going into the final half of the season. Still an improvement though.
TBF the 9th was unconvincing. Think we could've still finished 13th going into the final half of the season. Still an improvement though.
14th was possible, going into the final day.TBF the 9th was unconvincing. Think we could've still finished 13th going into the final half of the season. Still an improvement though.
A bit like last season where we went into the last game ahead of Palace14th was possible, going into the final day.