I agree. Can understand the frustration of people in this situation but don’t really think the club’s done much wrong. It seems fair to assume most people with any more than a passing interest in the club will have purchased a membership to get decent seats for the most prestigious games.I think there's two main thrusts here...
1. STH guests having priority over those with decent recent purchase history. Yep, as I said above, I completely get this and I agree. I'm not sure why the club went down the line they did, but if the overarching aim is to reward loyalty (and some may argue the toss what that means) then recent purchase history being excluded does feel wrong.
2. Struggling to buy tickets without being a member. That's the point of membership isn't it? I've read a lot of posts over the last week or so from those who became members so that, when they could make their 2,3 or 4 games a season, they had the best chance of getting a ticket. Whilst I understand why some may dislike this "pay to play" model, if I wanted to play, I'd accept it and pay up.
Once you make that assumption, throwing open sales to ST-holder guests makes perfect sense. For occasions this big, many people want to go with friends and family who are not normally interested. That’s part of the whole city embracing the moment, which is what makes it so special.
I find the membership scheme annoying but it’s been around a long time and everybody that’s bought a ticket before knows the situation.