sussex_guy2k2
Well-known member
- Jun 6, 2014
- 4,080
If it's a ban, it sets a dangerous precedent for me: Worried about an opposition player in an upcoming fixture? Stalk his social media feeds going back years and years until you find something he once said that was rather stupid / offensive. Bring it to light and expect the FA to issue a ban. Perfect.
I don't know about anyone else, but I was certainly a stupider, less mature person at 21, probably said lots of stupid stuff, and was more grown up by 25. The ages Gray was then and now is.
I think the fact that these have been brought to light and widely seen, drawing widespread criticism and bad publicity, showing Gray up to have been a rather unpleasant lad, is probably embarrassing and punishing enough for the bloke. No matter how good a player he becomes, no big sponsors are going to go near him. Questions will be asked should he ever get an England call up. It's probably going to stick around his career like a bad smell.
I don't think a ban is necessary or wise. Perhaps a fine and donation to LGBT support causes would be more appropriate.
It won't affect his career. If anything, it'll just make people notice him more. You only have to look at Terry, Suarez and Vardy as good examples of the so called "negative" impact of being caught.
I also think you're really missing the point and you, yourself, are suggesting a very bad precedent should be set. Ultimately, if he wasn't a footballer and yet he'd been caught tweeting those things, would it be a criminal offence? The answer, quite simply, is yes. And before you go any further and doubt me, there was an incident a couple of years back where a random man was jailed for offensively tweeting Muamba, the ex-Bolton player. This is one of many similar situations, so what you're suggesting is that he gets away with a criminal offence.
And with Grey, it wasn't just one tweet, there were a fair number of them that targetted different groups, showing just how vile he was. That its been found retrospectively and that he's apologised is irrelevant. He's basically done something illegal, so a ban from football for a little bit is the absolute bear minimum punishment he should face.
But what bugs me most about all of this, and I think this reflects poorly on me really, is that I hate his hypocrisy. He had the audacity to write those tweets at 21 and then, a couple of years later, he shows absolutely no self awareness when he tweets his own complaints about Burnley fans' racist chanting.
However, the key issue you haven't actually touched on at all. He's a person in the limelight who has been found doing something in his past that is basically illegal, and your reaction is to say, "well, he apologised, he was only 21, let's give him a fine that won't affect him". He's supposed to be a role model for people across Britain. Do you really want a scenario where we as a culture are saying it's okay to tweet that shit as long as you apologise?! Call me old fashioned, but that isn't a precedent I want set for my children.