But Spurs fans AREN'T especially happy with Redknapp, at least the ones I know aren't, and actually wanted him to become England manager so they could get someone else in. You say he can motivate players, but ask Darren Bent, Peter Crouch, Jermaine Defoe...
I will be pleasantly surprised if, under the white hot heat of the media glare, Hodgson actually manages to deliver as England manager.
His Liverpool tenure as manager was painful to watch, and Anfield is nothing as compared with England.
I wish him all the best, but reckon it has a 90% chance of going tits up, rather than a 50-50% chance with Harry.
But Spurs fans AREN'T especially happy with Redknapp, at least the ones I know aren't, and actually wanted him to become England manager so they could get someone else in. You say he can motivate players, but ask Darren Bent, Peter Crouch, Jermaine Defoe...
Thing is, if you are really going to judge Hodgson on how we perform NEXT MONTH, then you've already made up your mind, and no good he achieves long term will ever convince you he was the right man.
I agree. I would actually get excited at the prospect of young players having a go with a view that we're shaping for Brazil. It's a shame Wilshire is injured and wont be available. A good, young 11:
Hart
Cole
Lescott
Cahill
Richards/Jones
Chamberlain
Wilshire
Milner
Young
Sturridge
Rooney
Lots of pace, a good strong and technical midfield, solid defence.
Wilshere is out unfortunately.
Quite. Hodgson is a LONG TERM appointment. Anyone who judges him on this summer are THICK. Will be plenty of em.
But isn't the summer tournament really what it's all about?
But isn't the summer tournament really what it's all about?
It's a tournament so yes it's important, but you can't judge the new manager on how his team performs in what will be only a handful of games in charge. He is inheriting a mess, a shambles of a team really with too many ego's, too many overrated players causing friction whenever they're dropped. He has got a lot of work to do and it won't be done in 8 weeks.
Course it's important, but ridiculous to JUDGE someone on their first performance. Like judging a player on their debut and deciding "not good enough" on that alone. That would be daft.
Much fairer to judge him on the WC in two years time, when he's had time to bed in, get his philosophies etc across to the players.
Most people don't expect us to do well in Euro 2012, so the pressure's off Hodgson and the players. Hopefully this will turn out to be a good thing.
Most people don't expect us to do well in Euro 2012, so the pressure's off Hodgson and the players. Hopefully this will turn out to be a good thing.
What would each of you deem as success of failure this summer?
It's actually got to the point where I would be happy with anything above getting out of the group. That's my level of expectations.
What would each of you deem as success of failure this summer?
It's actually got to the point where I would be happy with anything above getting out of the group. That's my level of expectations.
It's got to the level of just being happy that the performances are encouraging and show positive progression from the rubbish in South Africa. I would be happier if England lost all 3 group games, but played good football and were just beaten by better teams, than I would them playing the same old utter shite from South Africa and scraping through before going out on penalties or something.
I'd consider it a failure if we didn't get out of the group. From then onwards, it would depend who we came up against. Saying 'Semi final is okay, Q-final is not', is daft. I've no idea of the groups, but if for example we were to lose narrowly to Spain or Germany in the first knock out game, there would be no disgrace in that. Beating Greece in a Q-F, then losing to say Switzerland in a semi wouldn't mean we'd performed better.