pastafarian
Well-known member
you are welcome,always happy to set you straight
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
"exremely kind,gentle and soft spoken, the most humble young person I knew"
- Thread starter cjd
- Start date
you are welcome,always happy to set you straight
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
Well in this case the allegation is that part of what tipped him over the edge was a campaign of harassment by our security services, who thought he would be amenable to becoming an 'asset' for them. Success there then.
And if someone could come up with an acceptable acronym for obviously none of this excuses his actions (ONOTEHA?) it goes here for the hard of thinking.
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
well you're always telling others what they can and can not do .........din alert !
regards
DR
pastafarian
Well-known member
Its quite astonishing though isnt it to blame the security services for pushing him overt he edge because they were simply doing their job,these twits at CAGE should be ashamed for peddling this filth.
Do CAGE and the other apologists really expect us to believe he was a model citizen who then for no reason got some grief from M!5 and then because of his complete innocence in anything related to Islamic extremism felt miffed at being accused of this so to prove his innocence went to Syria and beheadeded unbelievers
you really cant make this crap up
daveinprague
New member
Good to see you recognise your name.
Seagull58
In the Algarve
is is the key point.
This is the key point. Attention from the security services does not lead to radicalism. Radical behaviour and association with other radicals leads to attention from the security services (hopefully). These apologists simply twist the cause and effect to suit their agenda.
This is the key point. Attention from the security services does not lead to radicalism. Radical behaviour and association with other radicals leads to attention from the security services (hopefully). These apologists simply twist the cause and effect to suit their agenda.
pastafarian
Well-known member
what on earth are you trying to change the subject about
daveinprague
New member
Nobody is changing the subject...
If there was a thread about a UKIP individual on page 1 of NSC that was up to five pages long, that I had been commenting on, and I then opened a second thread about the same individual, you would be one of the first wankers to flap your gums about it. As you know. The OP is having a 'look at me moment'.
If there was a thread about a UKIP individual on page 1 of NSC that was up to five pages long, that I had been commenting on, and I then opened a second thread about the same individual, you would be one of the first wankers to flap your gums about it. As you know. The OP is having a 'look at me moment'.
TWOCHOICEStom
Well-known member
Sorry, but anyone who blames any part of the British culture for these people being radicalised is way off the mark. We live in one of the most tolerant nations on earth.
Disillusioned young people are certainly not a new problem to have to deal with. What is new is the fact that now (if they're religious), they have a huge group of lunatics tugging them by the arm.They are being pulled far more than they are being pushed that's for sure.
IMO it's up to the friends and families of these people to recognise the signs and do something about it. But more importantly, it's about these individuals not being total ****tards and realising what a wonderful existence they have here in the free world.
Disillusioned young people are certainly not a new problem to have to deal with. What is new is the fact that now (if they're religious), they have a huge group of lunatics tugging them by the arm.They are being pulled far more than they are being pushed that's for sure.
IMO it's up to the friends and families of these people to recognise the signs and do something about it. But more importantly, it's about these individuals not being total ****tards and realising what a wonderful existence they have here in the free world.
pastafarian
Well-known member
what does this mean?
daveinprague
New member
It means you recognise your title as wanker.
We both know that If I had opened a thread about a UKIP individual, when there was already a five page thread on that individual, you would be 'commenting' on it.
So feel free to do one.
Last edited:
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,772
The only point i would debate is the "if they're religious". I believe I'm right in saying that some (not all) of them have been petty criminals/general ********s for years with no interest in religion, who have then been picked up by the radicals.
pastafarian
Well-known member
The thread is about Asim Qureshi,the research director of the London based human rights group CAGE,i think that is perfectly clear from the very first post. No doubt you will be able to point me in the direction of this alleged other thread that had already been started about him that you claim exists
pastafarian
Well-known member
ok in fairness ill give you that,i have been on xhamster alot recently
daveinprague
New member
So, youre seriously going to say its nothing about 'Jihad John', and couldnt have gone on the same 5 page thread that the OP has been commenting on.
psst.....the clue is in the post.
'Guess who the research director of the LONDON based human rights group CAGE is referring to'.
pastafarian
Well-known member
no i didnt say that at all HAHA
i said it was about Asim Qureshi HAHA
and yes this nutjob probably deserves his own thread separate to John
HAHA........you will just have to deal with it
daveinprague
New member
I have nothing to deal with? Pointing out a 'look at me' merchant is not a big deal. Only you and DR seem to think so. Youre special.. HAHA I guess your family have to deal with it.
KZNSeagull
Well-known member
She enjoyed it - see her expression to camera after he walked off. It's a common theme with her - she just loves pissing people off with her, usually inane, questions.