- Oct 17, 2008
- 14,562
That match last night was absolutely terrible. Really desperate stuff.
That match last night was absolutely terrible. Really desperate stuff.
It took me a while, but you just have to suspend your need to compare it to the men's game, it's just not fair on them. We have a lady at work who use to play back in the 90s and it's made it all the more enjoyable and enlightening having conversations about it all with her.
It was pretty poor, however I can think of plenty of games in the men's Euros and World Cups over the years that have been just as dire.
So I've been to both England games at the Amex so far. Tickets for the Norway game were a Christmas present and I was quite meh about it until the day of the game. I'm writing this as somebody who's followed the Albion for over thirty years, but also as a woman who played the game for many years too. I don't mind admitting I've never found watching women's games particularly enjoyable.
The Norway game was far more fun than I'd expected, and not just because of the eight goals. Yes, the atmosphere was very different to a men's game. It's like the crowd desperately want to sing songs, but they lack the coordination and match experience to do so, which means the range of songs is quite limited, largely to Engerland, Engerland, Engerland; Football's Coming Home and the odd round of Beth Mead's On Fire from the more adventurous. On the plus side, there are no knobbers piping up with "Your Support Is ****ing Shit" or "We Pay Your Benefits", so, every cloud. I enjoyed the Norway game so much, I went after tickets for the Spain quarter final, and unexpectedly found myself bagging a pair.
The atmosphere for Spain was more ramped up, a slightly bigger crowd, with more adults and fewer school kids. When I noticed the bloody England band were present, my heart sank at first. I hate their droning dirges at England men's games: I think they actually detract from the atmosphere. But perhaps in the women's game as it currently is, they actually work much better. They lead the crowd, who follow on enthusiastically. The longer the game went on, the better the atmosphere got. There was no sense of fans getting on the players' backs even when they were losing, and you could sense the anticipation building as England managed to force the pressure back on to Spain as the second half went on. When England equalised, the whole place was on its feet. When they got the winner, it's the closest I've ever seen to limbs at a women's game: honestly it was absolutely bouncing.
It's great to see so many women and girls at the game, but you might be surprised to hear me say that the the best thing is actually how many men are starting to engage with this England team. That's far more impactive than perhaps you'll ever know. It's fantastic to see young girls looking up to Beth Mead, Alessia Russo and Lucy Bronze as role models, but it's even better for society if we see boys doing the same. For almost all of football's history, female football fans have idolised male players, so why shouldn't boys look up to Ella Toone? I absolutely love the fact that I've seen guys walking around in the England women's team replica shirts too. I've seen some men suggesting they like it but wouldn't buy it as 'It's a women's shirt". It comes in men's fit, just as the England men's team shirt comes in women's fit, so why not (apart from the £75 price, obviously)? The away shirt in particular is beautiful. It would be incredible to see men walking around with Russo 23 or Mead 7 on the backs of their shirts.
I really hope this team can really do something in this tournament. I played football for so many years, for Sussex and South East representative sides as well as my club teams, with no hope of ever making a career out of football, so it's still incredible to me to see these women making such an impact. I love the idea that kids now run up to Millie Bright and Ellen White asking for autographs. If you've never had to fight for recognition in life, then perhaps you won't understand just how much representation matters. Trust me: it really does, and I'm genuinely so thrilled to see some of these players becoming household names. I'd love to see England get to the final and win this thing, just to see how much it really draws the wider footballing public in.
Who knows: perhaps it might even inspire dull Gareth and his troops in Qatar? Go on, girls. Show us just how good you can be, and seize the opportunity to make a nation proud. Well, most of us, anyway
The Norway game was far more fun than I'd expected, and not just because of the eight goals. Yes, the atmosphere was very different to a men's game. It's like the crowd desperately want to sing songs, but they lack the coordination and match experience to do so, which means the range of songs is quite limited, largely to Engerland, Engerland, Engerland; Football's Coming Home and the odd round of Beth Mead's On Fire from the more adventurous. On the plus side, there are no knobbers piping up with "Your Support Is ****ing Shit" or "We Pay Your Benefits", so, every cloud. I enjoyed the Norway game so much, I went after tickets for the Spain quarter final, and unexpectedly found myself bagging a pair.
The atmosphere for Spain was more ramped up, a slightly bigger crowd, with more adults and fewer school kids. When I noticed the bloody England band were present, my heart sank at first. I hate their droning dirges at England men's games: I think they actually detract from the atmosphere. But perhaps in the women's game as it currently is, they actually work much better. They lead the crowd, who follow on enthusiastically. The longer the game went on, the better the atmosphere got. There was no sense of fans getting on the players' backs even when they were losing, and you could sense the anticipation building as England managed to force the pressure back on to Spain as the second half went on. When England equalised, the whole place was on its feet. When they got the winner, it's the closest I've ever seen to limbs at a women's game: honestly it was absolutely bouncing.
It's great to see so many women and girls at the game, but you might be surprised to hear me say that the the best thing is actually how many men are starting to engage with this England team.
It was pretty poor, however I can think of plenty of games in the men's Euros and World Cups over the years that have been just as dire.
I definitely sense a change is happening and this England squad are catalysts for that change and trailblazers for future generations. (Whether or not they want to be trailblazers I don't know; I'm sure they just want to go out there and play their football - but 30'000 sell out crowds, bouncing stadiums and 7 million watching at home live on tv suggests something is building). .
Agreed
Oh.
Well done for taking those quotes out of context and failing to include what I was replying to.
That's true, but there seems to be currently somewhat of a reluctance by BBC commentators and pundits to criticize.
As an example, 'a magnificent match between 2 pedigree sides' was one comment yesterday.
It really wasn't - Belgium didn't have any shots on target!
Sweden had 33 shots, but 24 were off target. Thankfully they got the late winner and we were spared 30 minutes more.
Now they were either watching a different game to me, or perhaps there's a fear of being perceived to be unsupportive?
Fair analysis and punditry is both right and needed. A dire game of football is a dire game of football, regardless of gender.
I've enjoyed some great Euros games such as Portugal 2 Switzerland 2; Netherlands 3 Portugal 2; England 2 Spain 1.
Tonight looks very promising too - possibly the match of the tournament. But last night wasn't one of them.
Sorry BBC, sometimes you've just got to call it as it is, not what you'd like it to be!
I don’t know why you needed to mention men’s football in the first place. I was correctly stating that it was a very poor game of football. Which it was.
Then I got the wrong end of the stick, sorry about that.
This reluctance to call a shit game of football a shit game of football isn’t restricted to poor games in this tournament. I made the mistake of watching the FA Cup final between Liverpool and Chelsea this season, that ended 0-0 AET and went to pens. Now I fully accept there have been some great 0-0s down the years but this certainly wasn’t one of them. It stunk out Wembley. But the commentators and pundits obviously had a narrative they were determined to push, rather than hold their hands up and admit that after all the hype we’d all just spent 2 hours enduing a real stinker.
This reluctance to call a shit game of football a shit game of football isn’t restricted to poor games in this tournament. I made the mistake of watching the FA Cup final between Liverpool and Chelsea this season, that ended 0-0 AET and went to pens. Now I fully accept there have been some great 0-0s down the years but this certainly wasn’t one of them. It stunk out Wembley. But the commentators and pundits obviously had a narrative they were determined to push, rather than hold their hands up and admit that after all the hype we’d all just spent 2 hours enduing a real stinker.
This reluctance to call a shit game of football a shit game of football isn’t restricted to poor games in this tournament. I made the mistake of watching the FA Cup final between Liverpool and Chelsea this season, that ended 0-0 AET and went to pens. Now I fully accept there have been some great 0-0s down the years but this certainly wasn’t one of them. It stunk out Wembley. But the commentators and pundits obviously had a narrative they were determined to push, rather than hold their hands up and admit that after all the hype we’d all just spent 2 hours enduing a real stinker.