Plenty of women's teams sometimes play against boys to get a different type of challenge, and from the outcomes it is pretty safe to say that they would struggle against any group of reasonably fit grown-up men... which is the reason we generally don't do mixed genders in sports.
Not quite sure why this question is brought up all the time. Was a similar thing when women's football broke through and became popular in Sweden back in 2001.. plenty of "could you ever beat the men's team?" question etc.
Rarely hear that about other sports. "Wonder where Paula Radcliffe would end up in a men's 5000m race?" Well, dead last. But its just the biological reality and something that you should shrug off. As long as the teams facing eachother are on a similar level, sports can be exciting no matter how much muscles the players have.
Yeah they would, and Brighton in 96/97 would be beaten by about a thousand different teams... did you watch that Hereford game you guys always talk about or did you sit at home watching Deportivo beat Sevilla 3-0? If your kids play football, are you not excited watching them play?
If sports was only interesting/entertaining because of the raw quality of the players/football, people would have no reason to watch any other teams than the ten best or so in the world... which luckily isn't the case.
I didn’t say it wasn’t interesting. I’m sure most of the sporting nation will watch the semi and final if we get there, including me, and it’ll be all over the news. But that doesn’t make it high quality. The Hereford game is actually a great comparison. One of the worst technical games you’ll ever see. We were angry about our home but also about how terrible we’d become. The difference is losing that would have ruined my life as I knew it. If / when England lose I’ll finish my beer, go to bed and sleep well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk