The Guvnor
New member
- Dec 16, 2013
- 122
Banned from attending any events at the AMEX, non football related including weddings. This cant be right on a civil ban?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Euro 2016 civil banning orders. Is this fair?
- Thread starter The Guvnor
- Start date
Banned from attending any events at the AMEX, non football related including weddings. This cant be right on a civil ban?
studio150
Well-known member
Discussed at length on NSC when the Argus reported the banning orders. Suggest you locate that thread little point repeating again.
The Albion can impose their own ban, and dictate the terms as they see fit - they don't have to tally with the terms of the Banning Order.
But as you say - for non-football events, it would be harsh. I do not suppose that is the intention, and I'd expect that a polite enquiry would see the restriction lifted for a wedding, or similar.
alfredmizen
Banned
- Mar 11, 2015
- 6,342
Who made you adjudicator of what can and can't be discussed on NSC ?
The Guvnor
New member
- Dec 16, 2013
- 122
- Thread starter
- #5
That was discussing the court restrictions, this is differenf
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,026
leaving aside entirely the matter of the cause of the banning order, its not unfair for a private organisation to ban someone from their premises. they need good, legal reason, and it opens up a loverly can of equal rights worms. the wording in the suggests exceptions can be made by prior discussion.
darkwolf666
Well-known member
Does seem harsh, but I guess it's a bit like a pub landlord, who can pretty much ban who they like for whatever reason they like.
Boy Blue
Banned
- Mar 14, 2016
- 766
Go to the Human right lawyers and get it over turned. The Brighton hooligans who smashed the pump house pub up got life time bans from the club and some hooligans got the HRL involved and won at the high Court. The court told Brighton football club they were breaching their human rights so the club caved in and allowed them back.
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
Tooting Gull
Well-known member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 11,033
Inevitable I think.
Not so sure about just wanting a 'happy relaxed family atmosphere at matches' though.
In the family section (where I often go), for sure. I'd like the rest of the stadium to be a cauldron and more intimidating for away teams.
Not so sure about just wanting a 'happy relaxed family atmosphere at matches' though.
In the family section (where I often go), for sure. I'd like the rest of the stadium to be a cauldron and more intimidating for away teams.
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
Paul Reids Sock
Well-known member
I see it as both inevitable and correct.
yes it has been discussed on here a hundred time about what actually happened and I am not questioning that.
But the club have to make a stand and set an example to try and discourage people from football violence. Whether justified or not football banning orders were given and this is just the next step. It even says to get in touch when the banning order expires, upon which they would probably revoke it - it's just something they have to do
yes it has been discussed on here a hundred time about what actually happened and I am not questioning that.
But the club have to make a stand and set an example to try and discourage people from football violence. Whether justified or not football banning orders were given and this is just the next step. It even says to get in touch when the banning order expires, upon which they would probably revoke it - it's just something they have to do
If you turned up at a wedding how would anyone on duty that day know who you were given you wouldn't have to scan in ? Idle threat that can't be backed up.
Boy Blue
Banned
- Mar 14, 2016
- 766
Yup. I was at Millwall and said to two of them i thought you had life bans?, They told me they took the club to court and won and the courts told BHAFC they were breaking the law as it infringes their human rights and the club sent them letters saying they're welcomed back.
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
studio150
Well-known member
How is this different suggest you have a look at post #1 on the following link, https://nortr3nixy.nimpr.uk/showthread.php?340452-BHAFC-Fans-given-banning-order&highlight=russians
Paul Reids Sock
Well-known member
It is crazy that the courts can say that - they are a private company and have the right to refuse anyone entry don't they?!
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
studio150
Well-known member
if you want to fully experience Deja-vu then fine by me