B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
A perfectly reasonable response.
No it isn't...
A perfectly reasonable response.
Most recently was Athletico Madrid.
When they relented and opened the East Upper, they did first with the center two blocks. Within hours, more of the stand was opened, and all of it within a day or two.
They then opened the West Upper in a similar vein. The West Upper sold out too.
The late demand was this game was huge. With a decent weather forecast this could easily sell out - you just won't be able to buy a seat on the lower tier.
So to summarise it is all down to those who could not be bothered with the 3rd round game where all the stadium was open but only 15000 sold?
This just isn't true!
This just isn't true!
So to summarise it is all down to those who could not be bothered with the 3rd round game where all the stadium was open but only 15000 sold?
Indeed. The only option, for a family of four say, is whether to sit with the away fans immediately to your left or immediately to your right.
It will really annoy some on this thread as it kind of highlights how stupid they’re being!
Or the MK Dons game , or Athletico Madrid, or Hull City in the league cup or any other game in the last 6 or 7 years where because demand is hard to predict they've done exactly the same.
Which is a very poor game (Palace cup) to forecast this game on IMHO... (I'm a statistician BTW)...
If an upper tier does open subsequently we'll have:
- Fans annoyed that they bought tickets for a part of the ground they didn't really want - they'll not make the same mistake next time - exacerbating what has happened for this game
If the decision is purely economic, I guess so. However, we have...
- Fans annoyed that they bought tickets for a part of the ground they didn't really want - they'll not make the same mistake next time - exacerbating what has happened for this game
- Fans who want lower tier tickets closer to the game (with mobility problems, for example) unable to buy them as they've all sold, farcically some to people who didn't really want them
That'll be me then. Bought my CP seat on day one only to be on my own with no-one within 10 seats of me. This time I've had to buy in Lower East but much prefer a higher view. I will be annoyed if I, as a loyal fan, have to sit in a seat I don't want because the club told me I had to.
Just to spite the club I may buy seats in the upper as well when they sell them.
My guess is they will release more seats in W1A and E1H before they open WSU or ESU.
Wrong on so many levels... key point is paying customer's want to sit in the upper tiers, and a moronic decision has been taken by the club to refuse to open the upper tiers... sales WILL go up if they open these tiers... ergo, you are spouting bollox, and Barber has dropped a HUGE clanger...
If the decision is purely economic, I guess so. However, we have...
- Parents not wanting to buy the tickets remaining (close to away fans and possible questionable behaviour - you may not agree but it IS a genuine concern for some parents)
- Other fans not wanting lower tier corners because they don't like the view of the game such a position affords
- Still others just not wanting to sit in a lower tier anywhere - it's not how they like to watch football
- Those wanting to sit in an upper tier as part of their Amex "different stand" collecting
Any of these people may have already decided to not attend this game and/or made plans that can not easily be changed if upper tier seats to become available.
If an upper tier does open subsequently we'll have:
- Fans annoyed that they bought tickets for a part of the ground they didn't really want - they'll not make the same mistake next time - exacerbating what has happened for this game
- Fans who want lower tier tickets closer to the game (with mobility problems, for example) unable to buy them as they've all sold, farcically some to people who didn't really want them