Are Grimsby ever likely to produce six or seven young English players who could represent their country in 3-5 years time compared to Man United B?
Of course, the other option is you let top flight clubs take over smaller ones. Struggling Oldham with no money for example suddenly become the farming ground for Manchester City's young superstars.
Basically, what Chelsea have done with Vitesse
So destroy smaller clubs just so the national and PL fat cats get to improve slightly? Nice one.
Not saying it is right the thing to do. But people have constantly moaned about England not winning anything and asked The FA for answers. So they have looked at the most successful European teams - Spain and Germany. What do they do? They have their B teams in the league structure to offer competitive football that matters against senior professionals so that the youngsters can gain vital experience. The top flight clubs also have total control over playing style and tactics, so that the players in the B side are playing in exactly the same way they will be in the A side which eases the transition.
That last point is the massive flaw in the loan system in this country. Brighton obviously play a certain way and players need to know how that is and what it entails while they gain experience. So Shamir Goodwin going to Torquay and playing hoof ball will help him how when he is expected to come back here and partake in a patient passing style?
All the FA are doing is looking at what works elsewhere. So is the potential progress of the national side and attempting to make changes to help them lift the world cup worth putting some lower league teams noses out of joint for? That is the question
I thought we already had a competitions for B teams - the Capital One Cup.
As I said before, in the most highly regarded league in Europe they have 'B' or '2' teams competing all the way down the leagues, yes there are restrictions on them being promoted, there are other requirements too that ensure it works out for the other teams in the lower leagues. It Shouldn't be discounted out of hand without first reviewing and understanding how it works in Germany.
Do people think the German league is the best? People say it's the best for the fans due to low-ticket prices, safe standing, businesses/rich people not being being allowed to take over clubs but in what is it the best league?
The talk on here was how it would ruin the teams down the leagues, the influence of the top teams would ruin competition etc etc.
I don't think I wrote best (sorry if I did), but I did write most highly regarded, which is how it is often spoken of here. People seem the think the German leagues can do no wrong, largely for the reasons you suggest, and the system there don't negatively impact crowd sizes, it doesn't lead to higher prices. And they have turned out some decent CL clubs and their national team is somewhat more successful than ours.
My point is, there is a system, within a considerable league structure, where the concept of 'B' teams would appear to work, and one assumes benefits football in that country otherwise they wouldn't do it.