English Defence Leagues Finest

[daveinprague]

What point? That their organisation is overflowing with ill educated, violent morons who seem to think they are the defenders of all things English?
That their national webpage was created by a BNP activist?
That they are regularly seen disrespectinig our parents and grandparents who fought fascism in the last war by giving Nazi salutes?
They are scum, and there to be laughed at.

 

[Return of the Rev]

What point? That their organisation is overflowing with ill educated, violent morons who seem to think they are the defenders of all things English?
That their national webpage was created by a BNP activist?
That they are regularly seen disrespectinig our parents and grandparents who fought fascism in the last war by giving Nazi salutes?
They are scum, and there to be laughed at.

my parents fought facism so they could be free to be facist

 

[Nibble]

Haha. not been on here for ages and the first thing I see when I come back is das Reich and Bushy posting like c*nts on a thread about EDL. Think I'll leave it a few more months and try again. Nice to see you all again.

 

[daveinprague]

my parents fought facism so they could have be free to be facist

See, we let non English speakers have their say here as well!

Time to head home...have fun...

 

[Pretty pink fairy]

Haha. not been on here for ages and the first thing I see when I come back is das Reich posting like a c*nt on a thread about EDL. Think I'll leave it a few more months and try again. Nice to see you all again.

have i said something wrong, oh well see you when you pop back then

 

[Rookie]

This Iraqi law invading London does that mean my qualifications are now pretty much worthless really don't want to study more law, I'm scared

 

[gruntage]

how do you know their criminals? seems like you want to pidgeon hole people on this subject, i know respectable people with mortgages and jobs who have the same views , don't be so naive you fool

is this the same as saying all Muslims are extremists? It's a bit of a contradiction to say 'we don't have a problem with Muslims, just extremists', and then in the same breath say 'England for the English'. As Islam is a religion and not a race its perfectly acceptable to be a white, English Muslim. What happens if a white English man turns into a Muslim extremist?! Does he get to stay in England or do we send him back to Islam?

 

[alan partridge]

[yt]AIPD8qHhtVU&feature=player_embedded[/yt]

 

[Lord Bracknell]

Well, yeah, the jewish courts have been there for years...

... as have the state-sponsored Church of England courts.

Whatever else you do, don't fall foul of The Court of Peculiars.



Church of England

In the Church of England, the Ecclesiastical Courts are a system of courts, held by authority of the Crown, whose wearer is the Supreme Governor of the Church of England. The courts have jurisdiction over matters dealing with the rights and obligations of church members, now limited to controversies in areas of church property and ecclesiastical disciplinary proceedings. In England these courts, unlike common law courts, are based upon and operate along civil law procedures and Canon law-based jurisprudence.

Offences against ecclesiastical laws are dealt with differently based on whether the laws in question involve church doctrine. For non-doctrinal cases, the lowest level of the court is the Archdeaconry Court, which is presided over by the local Archdeacon. The next court in the hierarchy is the Bishop's Court, which is in the archdiocese of Canterbury called the Commissary Court and in other dioceses the Consistory Court. The Commissary Court is presided over by a commissary-general; a Consistory Court is presided over by a chancellor. The chancellor or commissiary-general must be thirty years old and either have a seven-year general qualification under the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 s 71 or have held high judicial office.

Specialist courts in the Province of Canterbury are the Court of Faculties, the Court of Peculiars and the Court of the Vicar-General of the Province of Canterbury. In the northern province there is the Court of the Vicar-General of the Province of York.

The next court is the Archbishop's Court, which is in Canterbury called the Arches Court, and in York the Chancery Court. Each court includes five judges; one judge is common to both courts. The common judge is called the Dean of Arches in Canterbury and the Auditor in York; he or she is appointed jointly by both Archbishops with the approval of the Crown, and must either hold a ten-year High Court qualification under the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, s 71, or have held high judicial office. Two members of each court must be clergy appointed by the Prolocutor of the Lower House of the provincial Convocation.[1] Two further members of each court are appointed by the Chairman of the House of Laity of the General Synod;[2] these must possess such legal qualifications as the Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain requires.

In cases involving church doctrine, ceremony or ritual, the aforementioned courts have no jurisdiction. Instead, the Court of Ecclesiastical Causes Reserved hears the case. The Court is composed of three diocesan bishops and two appellate judges; it has jurisdiction over both of the provinces of Canterbury and York. The Court, however, meets very rarely.

Appeal from the Arches Court and Chancery Court (in non-doctrinal cases) lies to the Queen-in-Council. In practice, the case is heard by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which includes present and former Lords Chancellor, a number of Lords of Appeal and other high judicial officers. The Queen-in-Council does not have jurisdiction over doctrinal cases from the Court of Ecclesiastical Causes Reserved, which instead go to an ad hoc Commission of Review, composed of two diocesan Bishops and three Lords of Appeal (who are also members of the Judicial Committee).

Commissions of Convocation are appointed by the Upper House of the Convocation of Canterbury or of York to try a bishop for an offence (except for an offence of doctrine). Both Convocations make the appointment if an Archbishop is prosecuted. This would comprise four diocesan bishops and the Dean of the Arches.

 

[Tummy Burger]

[yt]AIPD8qHhtVU&feature=player_embedded[/yt]

 

[daveinprague]

That is brilliant....

 

[Wozza]

Sweet.

 

[Return of the Rev]

[yt]AIPD8qHhtVU&feature=player_embedded[/yt]

 

[Return of the Rev]

[yt]AIPD8qHhtVU&feature=player_embedded[/yt]

 

[NMH]

He'd actually have a good point if he just said he'd been made into a complete twat by muslims being in Britain

 

[stuartpeterson]

It should be like this. Commissions of Convocation are appointed by the Upper House of the Convocation of Canterbury or of York to try a bishop for an offence.

 

[bhaexpress]

What amazes me is how anybody with half a brain can not laugh at these clowns. They're too stupid to realise what a joke they are.

 

[Return of the Rev]

What amazes me is how anybody with half a brain can not laugh at these clowns. They're too stupid to realise what a joke they are.

But what about these muslims with ray guns!

 

[Return of the Rev]

I just love the musical version of the interview!
Its getting quite addictive,well they can't all be bad if they can laugh at themselves in this manner!
Would like this made into a longer version!

 

[Return of the Rev]

luv it!