Seems Bellingham is going to be dropped for Henderson.
The script for this was written as soon as the draw for the group stages was made. Hopefully it will be the end of Southgate.
It is what Southgate does, he is a coward, a fraud, a Palace dorkJeez - we have the ability to rip them to shreds, yet this is what we do.
To be fair, Bellingham was anonymous against the USA. Not sure why Henderson comes in though!
He sure did... with a little help of his friends (the footballers, who play some importance in where you end up in a football cup - or league for that matter).Didn’t Southgate get us to WC semi and Euros Final ? Am I missing something here ?!
Ah the 'Southgate Paradox'. Yes he did. Yes in so many respects, especially using the sharp matrix of tournament performances, he is one of the best England managers of all time. Better than Venables. Better than Hoddle. Better than Eriksson. WAY better than Capello, Greenwood, Taylor or Revie (and I'm not even going to include McClaren).Didn’t Southgate get us to WC semi and Euros Final ? Am I missing something here ?!
England to win, then?The script for this was written as soon as the draw for the group stages was made. Hopefully it will be the end of Southgate.
He's like Potter. He's a bit geeky, and this brings out the bully in us (which we express in different ways, from finding them irritating through to wanting to punch them hard in the face). Some of us have constructed a whole universe of confirmation bias to back up our position - won't play Dunk, Palace wanker etc. Every great display is down to the players, and every failure is down to the manager. In contrast, men like Venables (and de Zerbi) get away with murder with their blokiness and/or passion. Who will ever forget 'f***ing focus!'?Ah the 'Southgate Paradox'. Yes he did. Yes in so many respects, especially using the sharp matrix of tournament performances, he is one of the best England managers of all time. Better than Venables. Better than Hoddle. Better than Eriksson. WAY better than Capello, Greenwood, Taylor or Revie (and I'm not even going to include McClaren).
But yes you are missing something, he does have glaring faults. He is seemingly incapable of changing a game, especially one that's slipping away. He also would rather protect our weaknesses than play to our strengths. It's these factors that piss people off and blind them to his very real achievements. Also he does share two annoying traits of his predecessors: we can seemingly never win a game against the odds when we play a top side, and, like a lot of England managers he has a deep mistrust of skilled players. Back in the 1970s the likes of Revie and Greenwood never trusted players like Tony Currie, Alan Hudson or Frank Worthington who were just a skilful as any South American, but seemingly could never be trusted. Like them he prefers the (to slightly mis-quote Super Hans from Peep Show) 'meat and potatoes, straight up and down, penis in the vagina' type players. He is Chris Hughton and sometimes he should be Roberto De Zerbi.
Yes, good points. And of course we only got to the semi-finals / finals because it was the worst German side since Christmas 1914, etc etc etc. And no doubt people will say the same things if we do it again.He's like Potter. He's a bit geeky, and this brings out the bully in us (which we express in different ways, from finding them irritating through to wanting to punch them hard in the face). Some of us have constructed a whole universe of confirmation bias to back up our position - won't play Dunk, Palace wanker etc. Every great display is down to the players, and every failure is down to the manager. In contrast, men like Venables (and de Zerbi) get away with murder with their blokiness and/or passion. Who will ever forget 'f***ing focus!'?
My view is that it is what it is.
How dare you come on this thread and say sensible things about England?I think resting some players and giving another few blokes a chance is 100% the correct decision.
Are you making a dough-based comestible?Rested.