- Thread starter
- #201
Indeed. One of the great tailend innings.
I'm not suggesting that we should completely ignore batting ability - I still shudder when I think of one test when we had Malcolm, Mullally and Tufnell as nine, ten, jack - but bowling should be the prime consideration.
England have a habit of picking players who can bat and bowl but not quite in test class at either - Miller, Marks, Pringle, Irani, Hollioake etc Moeen is actually better than most of these but isn't really what we need.
You talk of this like it is a historical thing! I'd say they are at least equally as guilty of it now. Sam Curran is not a Test bowler, and nor is Overton. The concept of a 'Test all-rounder' is great in principle, but they really need to be worthy of their place in one of those specific disciplines, with the other a bonus.
Obviously the likes of Botham, Sobers, Kallis who were worth their spot in EITHER discipline alone, are very rare, but not too much to ask for one.
England currently, have only Stokes (as a batter) and Woakes (as a bowler) in that class. The constant desire to shoehorn in an 'all-rounder to balance the side' (like Curran) never works out well.