[Cricket] *** England v India *** 2nd Spicy Test at Lords 17th -21st SS2 11am
- Thread starter Taybha
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
I was in the process of typing how ridiculous it is that we have a glorious seaming fast wicket and we already have the spinner on……only for Ali to take the edge……Prior shells a dolly, again….
India's morning. 73-2 is a good start on this pitch no bones about it.
India's morning. 73-2 is a good start on this pitch no bones about it.
fat old seagull
New member
Matty boy needs to score a lotta lotta runs in this test or he is going to be dropped. Poor keeping. 
Matty boy needs to score a lotta lotta runs in this test or he is going to be dropped. Poor keeping.
The day after the ECB released a slow motion video of his wicket keeping prowess when practicing on the Nursery Ground too
keaton
Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
- Nov 18, 2004
- 9,972
It's as silly as bowling short and wide on it
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,269
It was a great toss to win but India will be delighted to go in at 73/2. It should really be 73/4 because of the two dropped catches and the opportunity the wicket afforded the bowlers.
If India can get through the first hour after lunch then the rest of the test should be a batsman's paradise. I can't see the Indian bowlers taking 20 wickets on this surface, and neither can I see England taking 20 wickets unless they hold all of their catches. We'll need to see some fielding brilliance to help make up for Prior's gaffes with the gloves.
That said, I still fancy that Prior might be worth a place in the side on his batting alone.
If India can get through the first hour after lunch then the rest of the test should be a batsman's paradise. I can't see the Indian bowlers taking 20 wickets on this surface, and neither can I see England taking 20 wickets unless they hold all of their catches. We'll need to see some fielding brilliance to help make up for Prior's gaffes with the gloves.
That said, I still fancy that Prior might be worth a place in the side on his batting alone.
fat old seagull
New member
The day after the ECB released a slow motion video of his wicket keeping prowess when practicing on the Nursery Ground too
Tempting fate !
spring hall convert
Well-known member
Bar a few slightly defensive fielding positions (deep square to Kohli when he first came in) you can't blame Cook here. Let down by the bowling and the keeper.
Massive session after lunch.
Massive session after lunch.
crodonilson
He/Him
Prior should never have come back in my opinion. He is the past and he for me is one of the leaders of this OTT, petulant, downright miserable brand of cricket we've been playing in the recent past.
I agree. His time is up, IMO.
He's more interested in cycling these days, sadly.
He does seem to have lost his mojo - it would be great to see him come back fighting, but I'm starting to doubt he will. Not that there's anyone pushing particularly hard to take his place...
spring hall convert
Well-known member
Buttler's the next cab off the rank. He's done pretty well - averaging 40 in Div 1 and scored a barnstorming ODI ton against the Sri Lankan's earlier in the summer.
Buckley's Mad Eye
New member
- Oct 27, 2012
- 1,393
Prior is terrific when we're 250+ ahead and he can come in and smash it around, unfortunately its a scenario that hasn't happened for a while. When he comes in (for England and Sussex) and we're under pressure, he rarely seems to perform with the bat.
Like others I'm struggling to name a successor....Jos Buttler maybe (eventually)?
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
It is funny, people start calling for Butler on the basis of one ODI innings and a Twitter campaign by cretins such as Piers Morgan.
Nobody actually takes into account that last season he did not keep for Somerset, so this is his first season of being a first choice keeper or that his keeping is poor at present. He will eventually take the gloves in test cricket, but not yet.
Prior is not helping himself with mistakes and he does not look 100% fit, but England have kept him on as a senior player as there are a lot of new players being bedded in.
Still it takes some pressure off Cook.
Agreed, though (as indeed with Prior in his early career) his wicket keeping needs work as I'd say he's a batsman who can keep wicket rather than a true wicket-keeper batsman.
If there was anyone pushing really hard for Prior's place, he wouldn't have been rushed back partially fit.
sten_super
Brain Surgeon
I agree entirely with the premise that Butler isn't ready - but if Prior isn't scoring many runs and is making a number of significant errors keeping it's difficult to see what they'd have to lose by playing Butler. I personally think that Foster would be too much of a backward step, but I'd play Bairstow, who has made some runs this season and is a much more established 'keeper (although still nowhere near Foster's level).
spring hall convert
Well-known member
Prior was a poor keeper when he first came in for England. If he's now on the downhill slope I think it might be best to take the short term hit with Buttler and let Bruce French work his magic. The key is whether Buttler can score enough runs IMHO, we'll make him into a good enough keeper.
Prior's fitness isn't going to get any better I don't think.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
He was a poor keeper and he was dropped for Tim Ambrose.
Prior went off and worked with Bruce French and earnt his place. There is no point in chucking a half ready Butler in. I suspect they will get Prior through this summer and whoever keeps in the Windies next April will be the one they go with.
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,269
We get rid of his batting at our peril. If England get their noses in front there is no better No. 7 for taking a game away from a side than Prior.
As for his keeping, he's right on the edge, but if he does lose the gloves it will be a shame as he's only 20 dismissals away from claiming the England test record from the great Alan Knott, and also only 325 runs behind Knott (albeit in 28 fewer innings). Both have made 35 scores of 50 or more.
His stats suggest that he'll need 6 more tests after this one to beat all of those records.
keaton
Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
- Nov 18, 2004
- 9,972
I'm not sure Prior was a poor keeper when he made his debut, he was decent but improved.
I'm not sure dropping him for Buttler due to poor keeping makes much sense as Buttler's a far worse keeper than Prior was when he started and got a bit of stick for his keeping in the recent ODIs. But we are as screwed for keepers as we are for spinners at the mo. If you were purely going to replace Prior from this team you may as well pick Foster who is a proper keeper and put Stokes at 7 but i'm not sure they'll persist with the current balance for much longer
I'm not sure dropping him for Buttler due to poor keeping makes much sense as Buttler's a far worse keeper than Prior was when he started and got a bit of stick for his keeping in the recent ODIs. But we are as screwed for keepers as we are for spinners at the mo. If you were purely going to replace Prior from this team you may as well pick Foster who is a proper keeper and put Stokes at 7 but i'm not sure they'll persist with the current balance for much longer