Wow.
With that he need never score again this season. Please.
With that he need never score again this season. Please.
It is still a foul FFS
It isnt, obstruction is an indirect free kick a foul is a direct.
Wow.
With that he need never score again this season. Please.
A televisual resurrection?. You must be clairvoyant. Now I hear his voice I feel like I'm being punished for sins in a former life.
It is, you're right. However in this game, if it was just obstruction in the box it wouldn't be a penalty!
I’ll be a pendant and state there’s no obstruction in the laws.Not disputing that but I am being a bit of a pedant in pointing out that its a foul either way and the only difference is the punishment and I cant see where two indirect free kick fouls multiply up to a penalty if it was just two obstructions.
Patrick Schick looks OK
I’ll be a pendant and state there’s no obstruction in the laws.
Law 12 impeding an opponent/obstructing
Don't say that a Czech they HATE it.Czechia are a decent side. But have clearly parked the bus.
Sorry way out of date. If you wish to quote please make sure it the latest edition.
It is now.
IMPEDING THE PROGRESS OF AN OPPONENT WITHOUT CONTACT
Impeding the progress of an opponent means moving into the opponent’s path to obstruct, block, slow down or force a change of direction when the ball is not within playing distance of either player.
All players have a right to their position on the field of play; being in the way of an opponent is not the same as moving into the way of an opponent.
A player may shield the ball by taking a position between an opponent and the ball if the ball is within playing distance and the opponent is not held off with the arms or body. If the ball is within playing distance, the player may be fairly charged by an opponent.
Sampdoria sold him for a lot of money him