Dick Swiveller
Well-known member
- Sep 9, 2011
- 9,524
Get this RSZ guy in, then. Is he one of these Sidemen I keep hearing about?Southgate isn't as good as RSZ, and England are not as good as any of the EPL top 8. That includes us. Fact.
Get this RSZ guy in, then. Is he one of these Sidemen I keep hearing about?Southgate isn't as good as RSZ, and England are not as good as any of the EPL top 8. That includes us. Fact.
Yep. Fact. Well, d’uh.Southgate isn't as good as RSZ, and England are not as good as any of the EPL top 8. That includes us. Fact.
I agree with you. Southgate’s results in qualifying and major tournaments speak for themselves. Those of us old enough get very nostalgic about the Robson 1990 and Venables 96 teams, but when you look at the teams we actually beat in those tournaments, the outcome of 2 semi finals doesn’t look as impressive.Which ones? Brazil and Spain have always played a certain way (Spain are actually more boring to watch than us), Italy are so all over the place that they didn’t qualify for the tournament after the one they won and France have played the same way for decades and have a way better group of players than us.
That’s not to say Southgate is a particularly innovative coach. He obviously isn’t. It’s all safety first quite clearly and I’ve said that on here before. But it gets results. His qualifying and major tournament results are better than any of his predecessors going back to Alf Ramsay. Given our world ranking is normally outside the top four that’s about right.
That doesn’t mean he’s beyond criticism. Selecting Henderson yesterday was mental and while Maguire knows the system he was poor too. Pickford is awful with his feet. I just see it as a bit more balanced than most of NSC. I see a coach who got us to a final, not a bloke in a Palace shirt.
If Big Sam was still the manager and England played like they did yesterday then those currently defending Southgate would be on the opposite side of the debate. * Yes, Southgate seems like a nice bloke but that doesn’t make him a progressive football manager.He should've walked after that game, and most would have given him credit for the achievement etc and he might have even got a PL job eventually.
We have regressed so much in the following two years, it's actually painful to watch. We are at risk of losing another 'golden generation' of talent with nothing to show for it, and it's all down to his godawful tactics. I wouldn't even say the cohesiveness that he initially brought into the team is still there anymore- most of our players look like they despise playing for England again, and those performing well for their clubs put in absolute stinkers tonight (Saka, Bellingham and Rice for example. Rashford was also appalling when he came on but not sure he really counts as 'in-form').
He offers absolutely nothing anymore. Slow, dull, caveman football with no identity or strategy. If he had any decency he would just step aside.
You are opposing something that doesn’t exist. Where are you seeing this ‘entitlement from land of hope and glory.’ You are the only one that has mentioned it. People are just saying they don’t enjoy watching England under this manager and they would LIKE a different one.You’ve just described every England campaign since 1966.
No, I don’t think we have a right to win because “land of hope and glory”.
Southgate got further than Robson and Venables.
Southgate isn't as good as RSZ, and England are not as good as any of the EPL top 8. That includes us. Fact.
Not the worst callGive it to Potter. f***ing hell, we all know that we played some great football under GPott but could not put the ball in the net. The best striker in world football is at the sharp end of England. I’m sure Potter has learnt a lot since taking Boehly’s shilling.
I think you’re probably right if they had the same preparation. Having a full pre-season schedule and training with the same squad 5-6 days a week is always going make it easier to create some sort of synergy than the situation National managers have of 2-3 days worth of training sporadically throughout the year.I think full strength England side would get in the top 4.
I’d love GP to get the job just to see how @Guinness Boy mojo would rise or fall as an England fanI think you’re probably right if they had the same preparation. Having a full pre-season schedule and training with the same squad 5-6 days a week is always going make it easier to create some sort of synergy than the situation National managers have of 2-3 days worth of training sporadically throughout the year.
Nah, definite vibe of should be beating “teams like”.You are opposing something that doesn’t exist. Where are you seeing this ‘entitlement from land of hope and glory.’ You are the only one that has mentioned it. People are just saying they don’t enjoy watching England under this manager and they would LIKE a different one.
I don’t think national team management would play to Potter’s strengths at all. He needs day-in-day-out contact with players and a bit of time and patience for his methods to produce results. He wouldn’t get either with a national team, and certainly not the latter from the English fans and press!I’d love GP to get the job just to see how @Guinness Boy mojo would rise or fall as an England fan
I’d also be interested to see if I could get mine back and if any Albion players would feature. I think Dunk was pretty cold towards him when we played Chelsea wasn’t he?
I reckon the FA will chase Pep for a few months, then give up and give it to Graham Potter.
Yes, but not because ‘we are England.’ It’s because of the playing resources that are available and their mismanagement by Southgate.Nah, definite vibe of should be beating “teams like”.
No International manager gets the time to ‘coach’ their elite players. What they need is a coach who’ll play to their side’s strengths and, if their strength is great attacking players, provide a platform for the side to do just that. Potter would have Rice in the Biss holding role (no double f***ing pivots) and then have some of the best English attacking players in a generation go and create chance after chance. The difference between England and his Albion would be forwards who can take a chance. Wouldn’t be many clean sheets (maybe wet ones), but we’d score a hatful.I don’t think national team management would play to Potter’s strengths at all. He needs day-in-day-out contact with players and a bit of time and patience for his methods to produce results. He wouldn’t get either with a national team, and certainly not the latter from the English fans and press!
I totally agree - but the FA will want to be able to evidence that they “tried”.Pep is contracted until 2025, no chance he leaves early - or without Man City presumably being paid a decent compensation.