All this kerfuffle about his selection is probably completely mute.
Practically everything we talk about on this site is basically just pissing into the wind. I've done it nearly 10,000 times now. That is worrying.
All this kerfuffle about his selection is probably completely mute.
Lescott at LB? Not in my lifetime.
It was North Korea (best Korea).I read recently (must have been the last World Cup, or maybe an African Cup of Nations?) that one team attempted something similar - they thought they only needed 2 keepers so selected an outfield player in the designated 3rd keeper spot, thinking that they'd been clever and beaten the system. Then FIFA told them that players in those squad spots could only play in goal. Unsurprisingly, the 3rd choice keeper didn't make it off the bench.
There is a flaw in your cunning plan - one of the countries tried it at the 2010 WC, and it was ruled that you HAVE to name 3 keepers, and they can only play in goal.
I read recently (must have been the last World Cup, or maybe an African Cup of Nations?) that one team attempted something similar - they thought they only needed 2 keepers so selected an outfield player in the designated 3rd keeper spot, thinking that they'd been clever and beaten the system. Then FIFA told them that players in those squad spots could only play in goal. Unsurprisingly, the 3rd choice keeper didn't make it off the bench.
I'd still do it anyway, then bring him on as a defender during the game if neccesary. Your move, FIFA.
I read recently (must have been the last World Cup, or maybe an African Cup of Nations?) that one team attempted something similar - they thought they only needed 2 keepers so selected an outfield player in the designated 3rd keeper spot, thinking that they'd been clever and beaten the system. Then FIFA told them that players in those squad spots could only play in goal. Unsurprisingly, the 3rd choice keeper didn't make it off the bench.
Who's going to stop me?You CAN'T.
Who's going to stop me?
I like being positive & love fact Oxade-Chamberlain is going (if he has balls to play him) but Downing!!
In which way is he better than Adam Johnson??
Johnson is quicker, goes past players better, more skill, scores more goals & has more assists.
I hope Downing gets injured in his time off this week & Johnson is brought in.
However if Oxade-Chamberlain starts I dont care as Downing will just be watching from the bench x
The match officials. They'll let you bring Jags on (in a keeper's shirt), but only if you take Hart off. If you want to then play him at CB (with no keeper) that would be okay.
At the very least I'd force them to stop me, exposing the silliness of the rule and bringing the whole house of cards tumbling down.The match officials. They'll let you bring Jags on (in a keeper's shirt), but only if you take Hart off. If you want to then play him at CB (with no keeper) that would be okay.
At the very least I'd force them to stop me, exposing the silliness of the rule and bringing the whole house of cards tumbling down.
The squads in major championships were expanded to 23 from 22 with 3 keepers to avoid this kind of discussion.
Conviniently ignores the fact that none of the Man City players are FROM Lancashire, and that Carroll and Downing ARE from the NE. etc.
Terry is of course, Innocent until proven otherwise. Despite how much I like his off-field antics, he is a very good player.
There was me thinking worldwide video evidence was proven. And he's shite. Did you see his display against Liverpool recently?