Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,274
I don't see a middle order of Vaughan, Flintoff and Read as any weaker than Collingwood, Flintoff and Ambrose.
Re my point about failing to take your test chance, Prior was selected as a wicketkeeper and kept as badly as any keeper I can remember in the last 20 years. When you're dropping 2 per innings it doesn't matter whether you average 40 or 50, you're still out.
My point about the county averages is that players of an age like Key, Denly, Carberry, Shah etc, if they are really test class, should be averaging 80 plus and scoring big tons just to get a sniff of a place, but they're not.
The county standard is mediocre. The likes of Hussey and Jaques scored a shedload which then set them up for Australian selection. The same should be the case for England batsmen, but it's simply not happening.
Re the new ball, I'd like to see Freddie bowl with it because he has excellent control, as does Sidebottom. I like the idea of 5 from Flintoff followed by 5 from Jones.
Re my point about failing to take your test chance, Prior was selected as a wicketkeeper and kept as badly as any keeper I can remember in the last 20 years. When you're dropping 2 per innings it doesn't matter whether you average 40 or 50, you're still out.
My point about the county averages is that players of an age like Key, Denly, Carberry, Shah etc, if they are really test class, should be averaging 80 plus and scoring big tons just to get a sniff of a place, but they're not.
The county standard is mediocre. The likes of Hussey and Jaques scored a shedload which then set them up for Australian selection. The same should be the case for England batsmen, but it's simply not happening.
Re the new ball, I'd like to see Freddie bowl with it because he has excellent control, as does Sidebottom. I like the idea of 5 from Flintoff followed by 5 from Jones.