RandyWanger
Je suis rôti de boeuf
He’s brilliant on the new Football Manager Mobile game. Not that that should sway opinions of course.
What position are you playing him in and what formation?
He’s brilliant on the new Football Manager Mobile game. Not that that should sway opinions of course.
I've seen him score 3 goals for us - how is that flopping at every opportunity?
I've seen him score 3 goals for us - how is that flopping at every opportunity?
Win some, lose some. Locadia is sadly looking like a waste of money but then Andone looks a steal at £5m, swings and roundabouts.
Andy Carroll is in the last year of his contract with WHU unlikely to offer a new deal apparently. Amazingly only 29, if on a free and on a pay as you play contract then that would be a no brainer for me.
I apologise.Don’t use stats to win an argument on here. That’s just ludicrous.
Yep.Counting the West Ham 'goal'?
Yep.
If we're discussing a player's ability, what matters is what they've done, not what a ref subsequently does.
Otherwise it'll be like turning to your mate at a match and saying 'wow did you see that goal?' and them replying 'I don't know, I'm waiting for the VAR to tell me if I did or not'.
What position are you playing him in and what formation?
Would put both Aaron Connolly or Richie Towell above him.
Won't be sad to see Locadia move on. Wouldn't get another chance from me. The interview he did with the Dutch media sealed his fate regardless of how poor his performances have been.
I'm simply sticking to the facts, and including a goal that was incorrectly disallowed as part of the evidence that he hasn't missed every chance. It's not his fault the officials got it wrong.So you're using a goal that wasn't given to highlight Locadia isn't as bad as people are saying?
Sure you can.Could I just point out that his laziness in failing to track back cost us a goal (and therefore the match) at Stadio della dogshit last season?
You can berate Gross for being offside against Leicester too if you like. I mean, he wasn't actually offside, but he was given offside, so go with that if it suits your agenda.Or shall we just stick to the unequivocal fact that he has just TWO goals to his name, and one of those was against a team playing in division FOUR?
I accept Locadia hasn't had too many chances thus far but neither has he done much to force his way into the team either. He hasn't looked massively 'up for it' when he has come on and when his big chance against Burnley came and went, he reminded us all that by his own admission, he cannot head the ball, which is a bt of a limitation in a team that plays wingers and likes to get crosses in.
I dont think he is a bad player or a flop...just not really suited for our set-up or preferred way of playing. Better for both parties to move on this one IMHO.
Surely the actual stats that count are his goals scored? Poor decisions happen every game, but you'd like to think the good ones eventually even out the bad ones. In this instance, you are happy to make reference to him scoring 3 goals, but the devil is in the detail: one was against a lower league side and the other one wasn't given in error. I'd say they kind of even each other out and you could therefore argue his record is as comparable as if he had scored 2 legitimate *league* goals.I'm simply sticking to the facts, and including a goal that was incorrectly disallowed as part of the evidence that he hasn't missed every chance. It's not his fault the officials got it wrong.
Triffic. I'm not really a fan of glory boys who don't do the graft. That's why personally I have time for Solly March.Sure you can.
Weird post.You can berate Gross for being offside against Leicester too if you like. I mean, he wasn't actually offside, but he was given offside, so go with that if it suits your agenda.
Surely the actual stats that count are his goals scored? Poor decisions happen every game, but you'd like to think the good ones eventually even out the bad ones. In this instance, you are happy to make reference to him scoring 3 goals, but the devil is in the detail: one was against a lower league side and the other one wasn't given in error. I'd say they kind of even each other out and you could therefore argue his record is as comparable as if he had scored 2 legitimate *league* goals.
Triffic. I'm not really a fan of glory boys who don't do the graft. That's why personally I have time for Solly March.
Weird post.
What are you on ab...You are becoming like him
Oh right.with all this multi quoting.
No, when you're trying to judge a player you look at how they perform. While decisions good and bad may eventually even out, as you say, they don't over just a few games, which is all he's had.Surely the actual stats that count are his goals scored? Poor decisions happen every game, but you'd like to think the good ones eventually even out the bad ones.
I'd say you look at them as they were - you take into account that one was against a lower league side, as it's relevant. I don't sing his praises, I've always posted that I'm concerned he's not right for us, but in response to someone saying he never takes his chances, I'd say he has a few times, and it's not like he's had many.In this instance, you are happy to make reference to him scoring 3 goals, but the devil is in the detail: one was against a lower league side and the other one wasn't given in error. I'd say they kind of even each other out and you could therefore argue his record is as comparable as if he had scored 2 legitimate *league* goals.
Nor is Hughton, and I'm sure Locadia knows that.Triffic. I'm not really a fan of glory boys who don't do the graft.
Not at all. Are you judging Gross on the decision given, or how he performed?Weird post.
All is not lost for him, he has improved in recent games. He just needs to look at the work rate, determination and tenacity of the two players ahead of him. Its not going to be gifted to him even if he crys to a dutch newspaper, he has to work for it (that really pissed me off that he did that). If he does the goals will start coming he does have some talent I just feel it has been a bit too easy for him in his career so far he got offered a professional contract with PSV at 18. Also if you have a player in your team that can't head the ball well then dont keep putting in crosses that high to him. Thierry Henry early in his career he couldnt head the ball he only scored 8 for Arsenal in his entire time there so we shouldn't fixate on that weakness. He is a different kind of player to Murray and Andone that is actually a strength if he decides to fight for his place.
Whereas I agree with everyone who is saying "wait, he hasn't had a run of games yet", I firmly believe the counter to that is straight forward. He has had limited chances, yes, but he hasn't taken a single one of them.
At this club, at level which can expect players to be 1) Up for it; 2) A team player; and 3) A Natural. Yesterday showed has is 1). However, crying to the Dutch press puts 2) in question and the missed sitter puts 3) very much in doubt.
Ultimately, I would expect all our 1st team players to be knocking in the easiest of goals when they are absolutely served up on a plate. Failure to get the basics right can't be excused by lack of game time. These are professional athletes and really should be match fit/ready whenever they make the 18.
He may be a great footballer, but the investment in him (cash paid so far and games sacrificed to give him the run that people seem to think he needs) just isn't worth it IMHO.
Loan in Jan, sale in the summer. Chalk it up as the one we got wrong.