Given that over 150000 Teslas have just been recalled for dashboard screen problems it’s not problem free motoring yet.
Have I mentioned that I find Electric cars lack any soul at all? Maybe that makes me biased. If you want A to B motoring on the cheap (after a high purchase price) and don’t care if the car is interesting to drive that probably won’t matter
What makes a car interesting to drive? My Tesla is by far the quickest and best handling car I have ever owned and I have had a lot of cars. Just because it doesn’t make a noise doesn’t make it uninteresting to drive.
In order to make it worthwhile, yes it would. The technology is still very expensive now.
Besides, any underwater instruments will render the river unpassable except at the time of the highest tides.
Do you like the giant Ipad for a dash? It actually offends me
We are all different. I have been in a Tesla that pisses all over any car I have ever owned for acceleration but I need the sound of a glorious engine note (normally an Alfa) and the satisfaction of a gear change at the right revs. It is a completely personal thing and I have plenty of friends who feel like you. A whining rocket ship just doesn’t do it for me. Nor does Driver Assistance which virtually drives the car for you. I am a DINOSAUR in motoring, I accept
Do you like the giant Ipad for a dash? It actually offends me
But with government subsidy, when does it become economical?
past the headline...
so jam tomorrow. 4 years from being delivered, need special charges and even then considerably poorer range than existing. this is not the solution you are looking for, move along.
I think that, even now, electric car manufacturers are missing a trick.
At present, most people's concern - and part of the whole culture of driving - is in not running out of fuel. And with a petrol station rarely more than 10 miles away, even in rural areas, you'd do well to cock up your fuel tank.
An idea - get owners of electric cars to pay on a contract basis, like a mobile phone or broadband, for electric fuel cell usage. That way, when they're out on the road, and the battery needs a charge, you simply pull into an electric battery refuelling station (no reason why it can't be where petrol stations are), put your card in a slot, and simply take your old battery out, and replace it with a fully charged one off the shelf in the station.
Then the old battery gets re-charged for the next person to use.
A battery may only get you 100 miles but (a) as technology improves, so does the distance and (b) you have the peace of mind of knowing the infrastructure is there.
It may be a bit of a pain in the arse right now, but that's the nature of where we're at.
What I would like to see is vehicles fitted with batteries with a modest range say 200 miles. If there was then a spare slot for a generic range extender battery, as per your suggestion, when a long drive is required carrying around the extra battery weight can suddenly be justified.
You might want to check out Nio, the Chinese brand. They're already doing something similar and their share price is flying.Fair points. But compare the size of Alan Turing's computer in the 1940s to the gradual miniaturised computers - far more powerful - that you carry in your pocket.
Even compare it to the desktop computers just 30 years after he made his first computer.
This time around, with precedent in place, I'd be confident of a replaceable battery within 10-15 years. Gawd knows how it will happen, I just am...
The obsession people have with range is deranged. How many people regularly drive hundreds of miles in a car day in day out?