I stumped a Brexiter yesterday when he was ranting about the ECHR. I asked him if he admired Sir Winston Churchill and Boris Johnson.I can just imagine the level of intelligence and accuracy in the debates.
“But we voted to leave”
“The ECHR is a different entity that we helped set up”
“Yeah but……we voted to leave!”
Particularly those who want to be deceived in order to justify what they have already decidedBoris Johnson as Mayor of London, introduced the ULEZ scheme. Sadiq Khan is Mayor of London now, but Grant Schapps is Minister for Transport, told Khan he had to extend the scheme or it would affect the funding from government for TFL (Transport for London)
Do you see how easy it is to deceive people?
Unfortunately it worked in the Uxbridge by-election.Particularly those who want to be deceived in order to justify what they have already decided
At the moment, it’s Jenrick making all the noise, with Braverman threatening ‘all the crooked lefty lawyers’.I can't see that happening. There are quite a number of Tories who would be horrified at the prospect. Not only would it put us on par with Russia and Belarus, it would also screw up the Good Friday Agreement and our Brexit deal. The more sensible members of the government know this
People being wrong so confidently will never not be amusing. Hence this post is quite funny.No it isn't. It's Sadiq Khan's, the Labour Mayor of London.
No it’s not! It’s Johnson’s policy that Khan is expandingNo it isn't. It's Sadiq Khan's, the Labour Mayor of London.
"That Khan is expanding" - yes.No it’s not! It’s Johnson’s policy that Khan is expanding
I can't see that happening. There are quite a number of Tories who would be horrified at the prospect. Not only would it put us on par with Russia and Belarus, it would also screw up the Good Friday Agreement and our Brexit deal. The more sensible members of the government know this
You have been shown proof that Grant Schapps put pressure on Khan but refuse to believe it."That Khan is expanding" - yes.
Anyway, argument is as pointless as it is unacceptable on a thread for rants against the Government (which I'm not much enamoured with either!) so I'm out!
I can't see that happening. There are quite a number of Tories who would be horrified at the prospect. Not only would it put us on par with Russia and Belarus, it would also screw up the Good Friday Agreement and our Brexit deal. The more sensible members of the government know this
The first sentence I could possibly agree with. The rest is hyperbole and exaggeration.The removal of rights is happening at a frightening pace and the British public is just sleep walking into it. We have already lost our right to protest, a fundamental basic of democracy, and no one has barely mentioned it, highlighting that the media will only communicate what they are told to. Labour have already said they wont reverse this. Now this. Whilst climate management is obviously very important there is much being proposed that will seriously restrict freedoms. The most disturbing is food management and the risk to independent farming. Control the food, control the people. Synthetic food to protect the environment the logical next step. Digital currencies are on the doorstep and mean your finances can be turned off by the flick of a switch. The WEF seem totally batshit crazy bond villain mad, are talking about chipping everyone into a dystopian AI horror show where everything and everyone can be monitored, and they carry huge weight in western Governments including the UK.
It may seem so at the moment but check out Freeports and Charter Cities. You don't know what you've got til it's gone.The first sentence I could possibly agree with. The rest is hyperbole and exaggeration.
Chartered cities really are the Tory Brexit rights dream. A place when you the rules don't apply, a place when works rights don't apply, a place when environmental standards are for the birds.It may seem so at the moment but check out Freeports and Charter Cities. You don't know what you've got til it's gone.
I believe that we were the major contributor to the charter. It was essentially, a British concept.And there lies the issue - the next GE the Tories will highlight the word European without explaining that the ECHR and the EU are two entirely different entities. The only link being that to be an EU member you have to signed up to the ECHR charter.
Planning permissions don't apply. Look at the 'Solent Freeport' All 'sounding very positive' about Southampton, but why does the area include the New Forest? Greenbelt? What Greenbelt?Chartered cities really are the Tory Brexit rights dream. A place when you the rules don't apply, a place when works rights don't apply, a place when environmental standards are for the birds.
Deregulation to reward vested interests was all Brexit was ever was and the useful idiots in the redwall would help deliver it
Britain played a central role in drawing up the convention under Winston Churchill, one of the current prime minister’s great heroes. Johnson’s maternal grandfather, James Fawcett, was president of the now-defunct European Commission of Human Rights from 1962 to 1984.I believe that we were the major contributor to the charter. It was essentially, a British concept.
Now watch as the foreign owned right wing press hand in hand with the Tories attempt to gas light the nation into believing that it’s essentially another part of the EU that we need to leave. So many uneducated souls will buy that hook, line and sinker.
I feel sorry for the Brits who put months and months of work into that charter to make sure that it suited Britain and was dominated by our preferences, values and standards. This government stinks.