[Football] Eastbourne Borough break in

[Bry Nylon]

Nigella has fallen on hard times....

I thought it was one of the Hairy Bikers?

 

[BN9 BHA]

Hopefully these chavvy grumble and grunts will be caught very soon.

 

[Eeyore]

The depressing thing is that when these numpties are caught and charged, given the backlog in the Courts they probably won't be sentenced until 2023 which gives them a lot of time to undergo burglar training to improve their skills

On the other hand, they have to wait two years to find out their fate. Two years marking time. In the interest of balance, delays are just as unfair on the accused as the victims.

 

[BN9 BHA]

On the other hand, they have to wait two years to find out their fate. Two years marking time. In the interest of balance, delays are just as unfair on the accused as the victims.

Yeh, got to feel sorry for the criminals.

 

[Eeyore]

Yeh, got to feel sorry for the criminals.

Nope.

All I'm saying is that in the interests of judicial fairness the accused and the accuser should be considered. Everyone is innocent until proven otherwise.

 

[jcdenton08]

Nope.

All I'm saying is that in the interests of judicial fairness the accused and the accuser should be considered. Everyone is innocent until proven otherwise.

Out of mild curiosity, how is your post in the least bit relevant to the topic? The ****ing burglars are on camera in the act of committing the crime. Their guilt isn't in question. This isn't a historic rape case, where witnesses move away or forget details. They are right there in the very clear CCTV images committing the crime for which they are sought.

Sometimes this place really makes me wonder.

 

[Knocky's Nose]

Nope.

All I'm saying is that in the interests of judicial fairness the accused and the accuser should be considered. Everyone is innocent until proven otherwise.

Does anyone know if these poor unfortunates who just happened to take a wrong turn down Priory Lane, thought they'd arrived home, found their keys wouldn't fit the locks, broke in, realised they didn't actually have a large, long bar in their home, and left with a case of beer so the poor barman didn't have to hump it into the basement ... were caught?

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

I swear I've seen these three wandering around the South Harbour (EB) quite a lot. There's also been a spate of thefts from vehicles round here, too.

Hope they catch the little scrotes, and the girl should know better than to hang around with feckless cockwombles.

Massive cocks?

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

Rather ironic really as everyone’s wearing them these days.

Not if you think Covid is a hokes.

 

[BN9 BHA]

Does anyone know if these poor unfortunates who just happened to take a wrong turn down Priory Lane, thought they'd arrived home, found their keys wouldn't fit the locks, broke in, realised they didn't actually have a large, long bar in their home, and left with a case of beer so the poor barman didn't have to hump it into the basement ... were caught?

And thought the CCTV needed repairing with superglue.

 

[jcdenton08]

And thought the CCTV needed repairing with superglue.

Actually, I take it all back. I can see now how a competent solicitor could reasonably argue their innocence. Isn't it funny how one can reach such a reactionary conclusion?

I'd like to thank this young man for his services to the community. Is it worth reporting the libellous Twitter post which alleges wrongdoing?

Now THAT'S sarcasm.

 

[drew]

Nope.

All I'm saying is that in the interests of judicial fairness the accused and the accuser should be considered. Everyone is innocent until proven otherwise.

Actually, the comment should be 'in the eyes of the law, everyone is innocent until proven guilty'.

 

[m@goo]

View attachment 134618

You can tell Spring is in the air as I looked at this photo of someone committing a crime and thought, yeah, I would.

Must be the child-bearing hips.

I wonder if the scrotes used all their glue on the cameras or did they keep a little back to sniff later.

Is she more than a child herself?

 

[RossyG]

Is she more than a child herself?

I assume so, but if she’s under 16 then I promise not to have sex with her.

 

[zefarelly]

Every time I read the thread title I think of this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UD_y44jsG0A

 

[jcdenton08]

I assume so, but if she’s under 16 then I promise not to have sex with her.

Too late. 2 year ban coming.

Also, I take offence at you assuming the lifeform pictured identifies as a her - or a person. What you've done there is offensively assumed the pronoun of the lifeform. I apologise in advance if my use of "you" has mispluralised you.