[Albion] Dunk?

[Swansman]

Yes, but would play him up front.

Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk

Three posts since 2014 and yet such a beautiful potterian mind.

 

[Johnny RoastBeef]

Dunk will come back in and Veltman will drop to bench

Don't be so sure, Veltman's passing is much more assured.

If Potter thinks his defending is also as good, Webster may get a rest.

 

[bennibenj]

Probably unpopular view...

My back 3:
Veltman Dunk White

IMHO Webster on bench and Burn no where near the starting 11... Really don't think he is good enough...

 

[Skaville]

Veltman can cover that position

No he can’t. He’s a centre half or a right back

 

[Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ]

Dunk in, Barber out

 

[Right Back]

Webster has been our best defender out of the centre backs ever since restart.

 

[Hampster Gull]

Probably unpopular view...

My back 3:
Veltman Dunk White

IMHO Webster on bench and Burn no where near the starting 11... Really don't think he is good enough...

This is where i am, with Webster the back up. What a back three that would be. Perhaps weakness would be crosses, but not sure the other two cover themselves in glory in that area

 

[Caveman]

Yes back in, also more of a goal scoring threat than any of our other CBs.

 

[bhawoddy]

Pick any three or four you’d like, that isnt the reason we’re struggling for points. Creating and scoring goals is the issue and has been for some time. We are playing decent football and I hope this continues but we need to find a way to put the ball in the net. No good playing well and never winning.

 

[Sea Eagle]

Seeing as we haven’t really done much since he’s been out. I’d say it’s a no brainer

 

[vagabond]

Probably unpopular view...

My back 3:
Veltman Dunk White

IMHO Webster on bench and Burn no where near the starting 11... Really don't think he is good enough...

I’m not a million miles aware from you.

I’ve been very impressed at Veltman’s performances so far. Has slotted into play and adapted to the PL very quickly. I love the way he’s not afraid to turn a player and start bombing forward. Adds a really good dimension to our play.

I disagree on Burn though, he’s a different option to have and always gives a 100% wherever he plays and his surging runs cause problems.

 

[vagabond]

Pick any three or four you’d like, that isnt the reason we’re struggling for points. Creating and scoring goals is the issue and has been for some time. We are playing decent football and I hope this continues but we need to find a way to put the ball in the net. No good playing well and never winning.

Correct.

Converting our dominance into goals. This is the challenge we have.

 

[bluenitsuj]

Yes obviously

 

[BLOCK F]

Webster has been our best defender out of the centre backs ever since restart.

I agree.
I don't see that White warrants being a pick in front of Webster.

 

[trueblue]

Straight in. No doubt. His experience is essential. All the time Webster’s distribution is as poor as it was last night, he doesn’t deserve to start ahead of the other 3. Might be better to focus on improving his defending rather than regularly trying to play passes that concede possession.... some of them only about 10-15 yards.

 

[blue-shifted]

Very tight selection decision, but i'd drop Webster.

Veltman dunk burn

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk