Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 12,085
Sauce?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] Dunk - straight red?
- Thread starter AZ Gull
- Start date
SeagullinExile
Well-known member
One of my punters said he just saw SSN say an extra game ban to be given.....however this COULD be extra to a one game ban thinking about it.
Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 12,085
No it's not a good example to set.
He didn't actually behave particularly differently than most other players would in similar circumstances.
The early reporting of it made it sound like he was raging at the ref and swearing in his face.
It was nothing of the kind.
He let slip a single curse, out of frustration, at a pretty poor decision. and a very harsh yellow card.
He was punished to a level that hasn't been meted out for 15 years.
He shouldn't have done it.
He knows that.
He has let the team down.
I expect a monster performance from him, on Thursday to make up.
Slum_Wolf
Well-known member
- May 3, 2021
- 766
Maupay's was three games with no appeal by BHAFC as it could have been deemed frivolous with an extra game ban thrown in for good measure. Perhaps we will find out what Dunk actually said if the Maupay case is anything to go by...
Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 12,085
I am looking forward to this.
Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo
I believe in Joe Hendry
- Oct 4, 2003
- 12,029
Maupay had a two game ban extended to three after he faced a misconduct charge. He missed the West Ham (h), Man City (h) and Arsenal (a) games at the end of the 20-21 season. He then played and scored against Burnley in the opening game of the 21-22 season.
As I said above Dunk would need to be charged for them to extend the ban and as yet nothing has been announced.
Slum_Wolf
Well-known member
- May 3, 2021
- 766
Indeed. I wouldn't be particularly surprised if Dunk is charged...
American Seagle
Well-known member
- Jun 14, 2022
- 896
Nothing to see here. And people say the EPL refs are not biased in any way 
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
…move that on about ten seconds and Goldilocks definitely used the f word at the bald one
pocketseagull
Well-known member
- Dec 29, 2014
- 1,360
Isn't the issue that Dunk got personal by calling him a 'bald prick'? He knew that he'd crossed the line. Refs will accept players being angry and screaming just don't get personal with the abuse.
Do we actually know what he called him yet? Does the refs report ever get published?
KZNSeagull
Well-known member
Yup. I remember when Elleray was miked up for an Arsenal game years and years ago. Arsenal gave him dogs abuse the whole game but he did not book anyone until Adams called him a cheat.
Think the difference is saying ‘f… off’ is deemed less ‘abusive’ than personalising it directly by saying ‘you’re a ****ing ****’ or whatever it was Dunk was supposed to have said.
Weststander
Well-known member
Exactly.
But Haaland should’ve been booked.
By coincidence a very informative ref on Sutton & Savage this evening explained the difference of a red or yellow for dissent.
Last edited:
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
So saying f off to the ref isn’t personal?
Especially given the aggressive manner in which it was said which was worse
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Agreed
It’s not a personal insult- subtle difference but that’s what they’re using.So saying f off to the ref isn’t personal?
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
See the rest of my post by me …the manner in which it was said …I’d say intimidating
Last edited:
portslade seagull
Well-known member
Shame if Dunk had played today 2 of those goals don't happen