Sorrel
Well-known member
It does look like there were "reports" of drone activities, followed by the police sending up their drones and people then seeing those drones and reporting them.
It does look like there were "reports" of drone activities, followed by the police sending up their drones and people then seeing those drones and reporting them.
Cover up for a big terrorist threat I reckon. Didn’t want to alarm public and sitting ducks at the airport so threw a few drones over the airport while they sorted it
names were originally reported to media from neighbours.
it is now recognised in law as invasion of privacy to release the names before charging. so they will be in line for lot of cash to soften the blow. tenuous but interesting argument i heard that the publicity led to faster resolution with employer and others coming forward to support their alibis. another point made was that naming people can acclerate an investigation as people come forward with information. im on the "dont name" side (especially before charging) but interesting views, its balance that we get wrong eitherway.
“The suggestion there may not have been any drones at Gatwick Airport was a "miscommunication by police", a government source has told the BBC.”
FFS.
First knuckledusters and then drones. I wonder what Sussex Police are lining up for their hat-trick.
i'm thinking it can only be topped by lord lucan riding shergar
First knuckledusters and then drones. I wonder what Sussex Police are lining up for their hat-trick.
Jesus sitting in a hand-cart being pushed by Elvis?
Son says it has been on the radio all day, but I havent had the radio on, that Easyjet are considering pulling out of Gatwick due to the drones . What makes then think the same couldnt happen at Stanstead or Luton. or any other airport.