Leekbrookgull
Well-known member
Some have argued and with some vigour the raid was in fact a war crime with Germany two months away from defeat. Seventy years on you have to ask what was the point ? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-31452693
Some have argued and with some vigour the raid was in fact a war crime with Germany two months away from defeat. Seventy years on you have to ask what was the point ? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-31452693
Some have argued and with some vigour the raid was in fact a war crime with Germany two months away from defeat. Seventy years on you have to ask what was the point ? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-31452693
Seventy years on it is wrong of us to pass judgment. What the men on the front line and their wifes and children back home had to put up with is impossible for us to comprehend. The bombings of Dresden, Coventry, London, Plymouth and everywhere else were part of a world war.
It upsets me when interviews of the men in bomber command are shown and they get emotional. They have nothing to be ashamed of. They were a generation put in a scenrio that no man should have to be.
The Bombing of Dresden was absolutely NO war crime, just part of a war.
Seventy years on it is wrong of us to pass judgment. What the men on the front line and their wifes and children back home had to put up with is impossible for us to comprehend. The bombings of Dresden, Coventry, London, Plymouth and everywhere else were part of a world war.
It upsets me when interviews of the men in bomber command are shown and they get emotional. They have nothing to be ashamed of. They were a generation put in a scenrio that no man should have to be.
The Bombing of Dresden was absolutely NO war crime, just part of a war.
PPF,my history is weak on your post,but why two was'nt one enough ? Surely the Americans must (?) have informed the Japanese government that they more nuclear weapons ?
2nd one dropped and they surrendered ,yanks didn't fancy an all out assault on mainland Japan after the fanatical resistance on iwojima and the other islandsPPF,my history is weak on your post,but why two was'nt one enough ? Surely the Americans must (?) have informed the Japanese government that they more nuclear weapons ?
Civilean genocideUp until Dresden and then the Nagasaki/ Hiroshima bombings, was that the Allies had bombed mainly military targets.
To try to finish the war against an enemy who refused to give in, was that we broke our own 'rules' by deliberately killing millions of civilians. It was a dreadful thing to do, but it was for the 'greater good'.
WeThe Japanese refused to surrender after Nagasaki, when asked. So we went ahead and bombed Hiroshima. Then they surrendered.
We
regards
DR
2nd one dropped and they surrendered ,yanks didn't fancy an all out assault on mainland Japan after the fanatical resistance on iwojima and the other islands
regards
DR
2nd one dropped and they surrendered ,yanks didn't fancy an all out assault on mainland Japan after the fanatical resistance on iwojima and the other islands
regards
DR
Your point on the Americans not wanting to face as you say fanatical resistance is well known,just makes you wonder what were they Japanese government thinking ?