Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Does Jack "The Racist" straw have a clue?



Dandyman

In London village.
HampshireSeagulls said:
As Looney is so desperate to own someone or something, can't we club together and buy him a puppy?

He can sit and argue with that all day, and, who knows, he may even win some!


:lolol:
 




looney

Banned
Jul 7, 2003
15,652
HampshireSeagulls said:
As Looney is so desperate to own someone or something, can't we club together and buy him a puppy?

He can sit and argue with that all day, and, who knows, he may even win some!


Win some what? Did you have winalot for lunch and mistyped as you licked your bowl cleen rover?
 


Deportivo Seagull

I should coco
Jul 22, 2003
5,467
Mid Sussex
HampshireSeagulls said:
As Looney is so desperate to own someone or something, can't we club together and buy him a puppy?

He can sit and argue with that all day, and, who knows, he may even win some!

Do that and I'll have the RSPCA on your case.
I think it should be a bonobo chimp, like Looney they spent much of their time playing with themselves and if looney started to annoy them, they rip his arms off ..
 


HampshireSeagulls

Moulding Generation Z
Jul 19, 2005
5,264
Bedford
Look, Looney. I have owned you in this thread regarding the quote. Your entire premise, that Jack Straw called us mongrels and was therefore a racist, was shown up as false owing to you having the reading age of a 7 year old.

You have been exposed as having no PhD, and now you are trying to revert to type - mistyped insults.

cleen should be "clean"

winalot should be ""Winalot" - it's a brand name and as such starts with a "big" letter (capitals, for the adults).

rover - should be "Rover" as I assume that you are using the word as a name.

Win some what? You need to refer back to the sentence. The action item was "argue", therefore the implied result was that you might "win some arguments".

However, I would suggest that you would be better employed licking your bollocks, and the dog should be given your logon and password. I wonder how long it would take to toilet train you?
 


looney

Banned
Jul 7, 2003
15,652
HampshireSeagulls said:
Look, Looney. I have owned you in this thread regarding the quote. Your entire premise, that Jack Straw called us mongrels and was therefore a racist, was shown up as false owing to you having the reading age of a 7 year old.

You have been exposed as having no PhD, and now you are trying to revert to type - mistyped insults.

cleen should be "clean"

winalot should be ""Winalot" - it's a brand name and as such starts with a "big" letter (capitals, for the adults).

rover - should be "Rover" as I assume that you are using the word as a name.

Win some what? You need to refer back to the sentence. The action item was "argue", therefore the implied result was that you might "win some arguments".

However, I would suggest that you would be better employed licking your bollocks, and the dog should be given your logon and password. I wonder how long it would take to toilet train you?

funnt that, I thought it was a family pet that was posting with your account. But then its pushing it calling the lobotomised offspring of jo brand and Nick Griffen a family pet
 




bhaexpress

New member
Jul 7, 2003
27,627
Kent
looney said:
funnt that, I thought it was a family pet that was posting with your account. But then its pushing it calling the lobotomised offspring of jo brand and Nick Griffen a family pet

Winner of the 'Twat of the year' competition.
 


looney

Banned
Jul 7, 2003
15,652
These to articles are for you 2 shitburgers to read and maybe get a clue................

Posting personal information

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SS is dedicated to creativity, not harassment.

SS will not accept the posting of highly personal information.

Part of this site is based on the concept that organized flaming is a game. Not only is it a game, it is the game. Like all games, it has rules, and while the game is highly competitive, the rules should be copacetic for all participants.

American common law has a dim view of those who engage in activities designed to threaten, intimidate or harass those practicing freedom of speech. Such conduct is referred to as “the chilling of free speech”. An individual's motivation to practice free speech is “chilled” by these actions, and this effect is passed down to others who are discouraged by the prospect of receiving the same treatment.

A similar effect comes into play when the dissemination of highly personal information, or the constant threat of it, becomes a daily routine in flame communities. These occurrences can have a chilling effect on individual members and the community in general.

Ideally, SS is a place where humor, wit, originality, wordplay, and sporting competition can be facilitated through flaming. Posting highly personal information is mutually exclusive with these ideals in the context of this community. That is the bottom line from here on out.

Questions? Comments? Angry declarations? Tearful pleadings? If so, take a few moments to make like a furnace and vent.


Humor vs Annoyance

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

First off, for those of you with a functioning frontal lobe, I apologize. I apologize because of the fact I even had to author this prize winning piece of obvious. Its sad when you have to break out the pie-charts and explanations to convince the slow and thickwitted that following someone around with some persons real info/photo in their sig and posting a one line explosion of angst after the same person every time they post, ISNT f***ing FUNNY.

There is a distinct difference between the two - harassment and humor. Though many may disagree, it is our (SS and the staff/crew) position that while harassment can be 'funny' at times, its an overall killer of a 'relaxed' forum environment in the long run. It also causes people to cultivate animosity for others over time and often leads to more retardation or RL nonsense. And though a straight up verbal thrashing is in a way "harassment" onto itself, you DID agree to open yourself up to that (proverbial punting) possibility when viewing the "agreement" for the SS forum community access. In other words, you knew what you were getting into when you agreed to partake in verbal battle. You DID NOT, however, sign on in order to be bothered, followed, post-humped (spammed), and virtually stalked every time you log onto our site.

Message to crazy folk - Learn to discern the difference between a petty squabble and full frontal flame wars. Again, flame wars tend to more likely than not be funny. Whereas, bickering is tiresome and childish. After you're able to tell the difference, you'll even know what posters to watch, what ones to place on 'ignore' and most importantly, you'll be more comfortable knowing that no dimwits gunna ride your ass with one line, unfunny quips and weakly articulated threats like an obsessed shitball.


You 2 professional masterbaters could learn for this you pair of puss filed peasants.
:clap2: :salute:
 


HampshireSeagulls

Moulding Generation Z
Jul 19, 2005
5,264
Bedford
See you've taken that bit out of your sig begging for personal info on people then?

You know, I actually had a tiny bit of respect for you, based on the fact that you had an opinion, and you tried to argue it. However, you have been shown to be a liar, an incompetent, and a general fool. You are nothing more than a sad, deluded Walter Mitty character. You cannot flame because you end everything with an insult. You are incapable of anything marignally resembling "wordplay", and I strongly suspect that the word "foreplay" is alien to your lexicon as well. Unless it is with yourself.

What a sad individual you truly are. More to be pitied than attacked, if the truth be known.

I feel very sorry for you.

(ps - MASTERBATOR - PUS - FILLED) Well done for getting professional right though!
 




Richard Whiteley

New member
Sep 24, 2003
585
What I love about looney is he is too stupid to walk away when he has been well and truly bukkake owned. He'll probably post a really offensive picture any moment now to get this thread closed, because every fucker from NSC, be they right, left , centre or whatever, is laughing their arse off at him.


Geek.
 


bhaexpress

New member
Jul 7, 2003
27,627
Kent
Richard Whiteley said:
What I love about looney is he is too stupid to walk away when he has been well and truly bukkake owned. He'll probably post a really offensive picture any moment now to get this thread closed, because every fucker from NSC, be they right, left , centre or whatever, is laughing their arse off at him.


Geek.

Sorry to tell you but I have it 'On good authority' that you're gay. Of course that has no effect on your opinions.
 


looney

Banned
Jul 7, 2003
15,652
HampshireSeagulls said:
See you've taken that bit out of your sig begging for personal info on people then?

You know, I actually had a tiny bit of respect for you, based on the fact that you had an opinion, and you tried to argue it. However, you have been shown to be a liar, an incompetent, and a general fool. You are nothing more than a sad, deluded Walter Mitty character. You cannot flame because you end everything with an insult. You are incapable of anything marignally resembling "wordplay", and I strongly suspect that the word "foreplay" is alien to your lexicon as well. Unless it is with yourself.


So when did I lie?
 




looney

Banned
Jul 7, 2003
15,652
Richard Whiteley said:
What I love about looney is he is too stupid to walk away when he has been well and truly bukkake owned. He'll probably post a really offensive picture any moment now to get this thread closed, because every fucker from NSC, be they right, left , centre or whatever, is laughing their arse off at him.



just done a search on your posts dumbass, looks a lot like a poster with 2 accounts. Care to share your other username?
 




bhaexpress

New member
Jul 7, 2003
27,627
Kent
looney said:
That good authority would be enigma then.:lolol:

Clearly the old adage about it taking one to know one applies in your case.
 






HampshireSeagulls

Moulding Generation Z
Jul 19, 2005
5,264
Bedford
looney said:
So when did I lie?


Right about here - http://85.234.132.19/showthread.php?s=&threadid=70626&perpage=40&highlight=doctorate&pagenumber=2

When you claimed:

"I have 2 doctorates in Philosophy."

You aren't even fun anymore. If I'd have bought a ticket in a lottery to win you, I would be after a refund. No challenge, no amusement, but you do have consistency. The consistency of diarohhea......

Can someone else please own Looney, I don't want him. It must be someone else's turn, surely?
 
Last edited:


E

enigma

Guest
Vintage Looney. Get owned, then just start throwing about insults (generated by a programme) and various gay comments.

What a life you lead.:lolol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:


looney

Banned
Jul 7, 2003
15,652
HampshireSeagulls said:
Right about here - http://85.234.132.19/showthread.php?s=&threadid=70626&perpage=40&highlight=doctorate&pagenumber=2

When you claimed:

"I have 2 doctorates in Philosophy."

You aren't even fun anymore. If I'd have bought a ticket in a lottery to win you, I would be after a refund. No challenge, no amusement, but you do have consistency. The consistency of diarohhea......

Can someone else please own Looney, I don't want him. It must be someone else's turn, surely?


Face it low brow that was obviously a joke. someone with 2 phd's would have better things to do than dirty there hands with you tards.
 




HampshireSeagulls

Moulding Generation Z
Jul 19, 2005
5,264
Bedford
Sinking, not waving Looney, you are sinking, not waving. What a sad end to such an illustrious NSC career. Exposed as a fraud, charlatan, and full-blown Walter Mitty character.

Actually, we write off 99% of what you say as a joke.

THEIR hands....you 'TARDS. Getting better, you get full marks for spelling "obviously" right.
 


looney

Banned
Jul 7, 2003
15,652
enigma said:
Vintage Looney. Get owned, then just start throwing about insults (generated by a programme) and various gay comments.

What a life you lead.:lolol:

and what a life you lead flamming on here more than I do, continually sucking up to other posters because you lack the nads to go toe to toe with anyone, like you lack the spine to post on a flame forum ya f***ing jellyfish.

crossposted.

You can never call me a geek for reasons I've listed time and time again.

I dont "flame" at all, stop associating me with your smelly games.


Yea right retard. Your a liar as well as a spineless little shit.

I have a go at 1066 when he posts stupid stuff

You mean flamed dunce, and who are you to judge whats stupid. Your the dumbest poster on this board and thats saying something with bhaexpress and Richard Whitley imp stinking up every other thread with their bullshit.



:salute:
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here