- Thread starter
- #61
That’s correctMight have this wrong, but not sure RDZ mentioned Barbs in his list of thanks.
That’s correctMight have this wrong, but not sure RDZ mentioned Barbs in his list of thanks.
C level
As in Chief “something” Officer. It’s not a school report.
Like I said, they’re questions.
He did in his post match TV interviewMight have this wrong, but not sure RDZ mentioned Barbs in his list of thanks.
As we’ve experienced (and by that I mean Goldstone era fans), running out of money or having terrible ownership bent on self enrichment is a bad thing.Fans run on emotions not logic. They think there are magic money trees and that owners, not they, should pay for the dream. They think that clubs can hold on to players that want to play at a higher level. They think that owners should create money and should also pay them wages that are unsustainable. They think that owners should take risks then get all upset when it goes wrong.
Football needs Paul Barbers more than RDZs because they run sound finances.
What football fans forget is that the boring stuff in football is more important than the exciting stuff. It's the boring stuff, done well, that keeps clubs alive and, in our case, punching at a level we shouldn't really be at.
For me our biggest signing was Barber on a six year contract. Boring though it is.
It was fun under RDZ, but his moaning and brinkmanship for the last few months made me want it all to end. I said a while back it may be affecting the team. I think I was right.
I’d say they were wrong.As we’ve experienced (and by that I mean Goldstone era fans), running out of money or having terrible ownership bent on self enrichment is a bad thing.
But we’re old. What if I told you a growing number of younger, working class fans feel that the club wants to replace them with tourists and DFLs? That passion is frowned on?
Or that a fan base who drinks in town combined with a coach who might want to kick on aren’t great for the P/L bottom line?
Fans thinking the first point is absurd. The majority are season ticket holders and the rest on memberships. Pretty much the same scheme we had in the old days you and I remember.As we’ve experienced (and by that I mean Goldstone era fans), running out of money or having terrible ownership bent on self enrichment is a bad thing.
But we’re old. What if I told you a growing number of younger, working class fans feel that the club wants to replace them with tourists and DFLs? That passion is frowned on?
Or that a fan base who drinks in town combined with a coach who might want to kick on aren’t great for the P/L bottom line?
He thanked Barber and his family in his postmatch interviewI’ll make this simpler.
RDZ went round the pitch and most Brighton fans sang “we want you to stay”.
a) would they do the same on PBOBE’s leaving do? And
B) why were Tony and others name checked and our CEO not? Odd or not?
Both are questions, not statements.
Go.
But we’re old. What if I told you a growing number of younger, working class fans feel that the club wants to replace them with tourists and DFLs? That passion is frowned on?
No they're not. The club hands out bans left and right for small infractions as if we have unlimited support. They're perfectly fine with big six fans all over the home end every time we play one of them at home.I’d say they were wrong.
That is the nature of the industry now in top flight football though isn’t it. Courting ‘tourists’ and corporate sponsorship (which comes with it’s own rigid T&As), is how we compete financially and why PBOBE is such a valued member of staff - one of the reasons Brighton Station site was turned down was because the site wasn’t large enough to accommodate all the infrastructure required for corporate functions/guests/fan zones/shop etc - Even at the Falmer site, with a maximum stadium capacity of half that of the biggest top 5 Clubs and a capacity that puts us 13th in the League, we need the tourists and deep pockets to be financially competitive and we need to be financially competitive to finance the football that allows us to compete as a mid-table team in the EPL..No they're not. The club hands out bans left and right for small infractions as if we have unlimited support. They're perfectly fine with big six fans all over the home end every time we play one of them at home.
I genuinely believe Barber despises traditional football supporters. He wants two team JCLs or tourists who have deep pockets and behave respectively at all times. The club has actively sanitised itself in every aspect to court these type of supporters.
And even if you scoff and disagree with me, which I'm sure you will, it is a fact that much of our younger support agree with my point of view. And that, you must admit, is a problem.
No scoffing ! But It’s taking a serious generational PL wide issue of cost, fairness - simplifying it greatly, exaggerating some valid issues (eg rules and bans) . Implying Brighton are somehow in the vanguard of all of it , arguing that the fanzone of all things is suspicious or important and then adding in personal, unfair criticism like x “ despises supporters “ (really ? ) .No they're not. The club hands out bans left and right for small infractions as if we have unlimited support. They're perfectly fine with big six fans all over the home end every time we play one of them at home.
I genuinely believe Barber despises traditional football supporters. He wants two team JCLs or tourists who have deep pockets and behave respectively at all times. The club has actively sanitised itself in every aspect to court these type of supporters.
And even if you scoff and disagree with me, which I'm sure you will, it is a fact that much of our younger support agree with my point of view. And that, you must admit, is a problem.
It's not a fact. It's your perception.And even if you scoff and disagree with me, which I'm sure you will, it is a fact that much of our younger support agree with my point of view. And that, you must admit, is a prproblem.
There is a saying I believe in don’t piss off those who helped you get to the top because you will sure as hell need them on the way down.That is the nature of the industry now in top flight football though isn’t it. Courting ‘tourists’ and corporate sponsorship (which comes with it’s own rigid T&As), is how we compete financially and why PBOBE is such a valued member of staff - one of the reasons Brighton Station site was turned down was because the site wasn’t large enough to accommodate all the infrastructure required for corporate functions/guests/fan zones/shop etc - Even at the Falmer site, with a maximum stadium capacity of half that of the biggest top 5 Clubs and a capacity that puts us 13th in the League, we need the tourists and deep pockets to be financially competitive and we need to be financially competitive to finance the football that allows us to compete as a mid-table team in the EPL..
Perhaps go and stand on the touchline of a local non-league club and enjoy some ‘traditional football’ occasionally - it’s what a lot of older Brighton fans do these days.