- Aug 7, 2003
- 8,068
Isn't that wealth?
If some earned £400k each year, lived in a rented home and blew all their earnings on a lifestyle, wouldn't they be rich?
No, just stupid as they’d have nothing to show for it.
Isn't that wealth?
If some earned £400k each year, lived in a rented home and blew all their earnings on a lifestyle, wouldn't they be rich?
But the vast majority of people adjust their expenditure to their earnings. There are always exceptions but I don't believe that would be the case with you, if you earnt that much. Especially as usually you gradually increase your pay over time so it is smaller increments. Go from 20k-25k you might eat out a bit more, 25k-35k you might have an extra weekend break + nicer car... etc
A glimpse into the life of an accounting coupleOn the whole I’d say you’re spot on, as the wages go up the spending goes up, it’s easy to do and many people fall into that trap. Mrs DFP and myself are very much on the same page when it comes to finances, we’re careful but not tight fisted. We know who we are and what we want from life. Without boring you too much, whilst I’m sure our spending would increase slightly, we simply aren’t the kind of people that spend money for the sake of it, everything is calculated and we’ve found it’s a way of life that works for us.
What if you earn £50k, but your wife doesn't work and brings up the two kids? And you have a large mortgage?
It's all down to circumstances.
Definitely means you're rich. If you don't think so then you simply don't realise how lucky you are. Millions upon millions of people around the world would give anything to earn anywhere near that kind of money - even relative to their own country.
For those with school-age children, the earnings band between £50k and £60k sees the loss of child benefit, giving an effective tax rate on this £10k of:
- Child - 51%
- Children - 58%
- Children - 65%
- Children - 72%
- Etc.
Is this a good thing or a bad thing?A glimpse into the life of an accounting couple
Sent from my SM-A310F using Tapatalk
Are you both accountants?Is this a good thing or a bad thing?
A glimpse into the life of an accounting couple
Sent from my SM-A310F using Tapatalk
The argument making the rich richer is a bit of a "Class warrior" type statement and creates a knee jerk reaction from people in the higher tax bracket.
I earn close to £70k , Divorced and re-married with 3 kids.
I wouldn't say I'm rich, far from it, but if I had to deal with an emergency, I could cut back on some small luxuries and probably cope.
Do I need a tax cut more than people earning minimum wage, the unemployed etc? No I don't.
But for as long as I can remember government's have given bigger tax breaks to higher earners.
It is illogical, but it is the way governments think.
Absolutely not, why?Are you both accountants?
Sent from my SM-A310F using Tapatalk
I earn close to £70k.
Absolutely not, why?
The very organised budgetary controls and prudence?
Child benefit is a taxpayer state benefit, it’s not part of a salaried income.
It’s like the unemployed referring to their social benefits as “wages”.
Surely being rich is to do with what you own, not your annual salary. Ultimately, the rich own the land and accumulate wealth based upon that and their other assets. Hence they do not have a salary at all, just (frequently undertaxed) income.
Rich.