Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Misc] Dodgy fire sticks going down ..



Questions

Habitual User
Oct 18, 2006
25,504
Worthing
Mine and quite a few friends have had their streaming services stopped. Are THEY getting to them out there ?
 




Chicken Run

Member Since Jul 2003
NSC Patron
Jul 17, 2003
19,805
Valley of Hangleton
My brother in law works for an agency tasked solely with dealing with this, I can’t begin to tell you some of the stories he’s told me about their plans 🤔
 












Taybha

Whalewhine
Oct 8, 2008
27,665
Uwantsumorwat
Why is having a fire stick a problem if they're sold legally? I've just figured out how to get my 5th channel and it's in colour so how would any sort of company have the right to down your fire stick.

Obviously this may seem like a daft question for those that use it to it's full potential but I'm curious to understand how something legal is now deemed illegal 🥺.
 


jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
14,501
Why is having a fire stick a problem if they're sold legally? I've just figured out how to get my 5th channel and it's in colour so how would any sort of company have the right to down your fire stick.

Obviously this may seem like a daft question for those that use it to it's full potential but I'm curious to understand how something legal is now deemed illegal 🥺.
This is about “illegal” streaming of football matches, as a way of circumventing paying for Sky Sports/BT Sport subscriptions. There are also services for movies, PPV events, thousands of channels from around the world. Basically it’s bootlegging, but in HD and for a fraction of the price of one monthly subscription, never mind the ten or so you’d need to get everything these services offer.

The companies (Sky, BT, Peacock et al) lose a lot revenue, so are pretty desperate to shut down the services.

All the police do is, supported by private prosecutions from BigTelly, shut down the services and prosecute the people running it. To try and put people off using these services, they are doing the old scare tactics the BBC used to do with their license fees (unmarked vans driving around looking for unlicensed TV signals) - which is of course bollocks.

They’re interested in the ring leaders, not the punters.
 






phoenix

Well-known member
May 18, 2009
2,867
Give me a genuine Peacock subscription in the uk that lets me watch live premier football on a saturday and i'm sure i will subscribe. I already pay for Sky and BT so they are not losing money because of me. Obviously i don't know how to use these dodgy items anyway. As i'm over 30.

Perhaps just perhaps there are loads of football fans out there who just want to watch their football team and are NOT trying to steal from these multi billion companies. I mean with Brighton sold out for more or less the whole season it's not that easy to get a ticket anyway.
 


Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,780
GOSBTS
Can't say I'm concerned about the profits of Sky and BT!
How about money going to ecrime gangs, dodgy nation states and those hosting dubious content alongside it (child porn etc)
 




Dick Swiveller

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2011
9,524
How about money going to ecrime gangs, dodgy nation states and those hosting dubious content alongside it (child porn etc)
Can't be right. NSC's biggest advocate of these services finds it hilarious at my suggestion that his money could be going to organised crime and it is only the "good" money laundering they do. And yet not one person who uses them answered my question as to who they thought their money was going to.
 


Comrade Sam

Comrade Sam
Jan 31, 2013
1,920
Walthamstow
How about money going to ecrime gangs, dodgy nation states and those hosting dubious content alongside it (child porn etc)
As for dodgy nation states, my taxes pay to arm most of them. I've not been using sites that host child porn. What I find amusing is all these legit companies ads appear on illegally streamed sites.
 


Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,780
GOSBTS
As for dodgy nation states, my taxes pay to arm most of them. I've not been using sites that host child porn. What I find amusing is all these legit companies ads appear on illegally streamed sites.
Of course some of these streaming feeds are hosted in ‘untouchable’ places that also host things like child porn.

Any streaming services in legit hosting spaces don’t last long, so they need to go ‘underground’ so to speak - google bulletproof hosting, that’s exactly the kind of places these streams are hosted
 
Last edited:




Taybha

Whalewhine
Oct 8, 2008
27,665
Uwantsumorwat
This is about “illegal” streaming of football matches, as a way of circumventing paying for Sky Sports/BT Sport subscriptions. There are also services for movies, PPV events, thousands of channels from around the world. Basically it’s bootlegging, but in HD and for a fraction of the price of one monthly subscription, never mind the ten or so you’d need to get everything these services offer.

The companies (Sky, BT, Peacock et al) lose a lot revenue, so are pretty desperate to shut down the services.

All the police do is, supported by private prosecutions from BigTelly, shut down the services and prosecute the people running it. To try and put people off using these services, they are doing the old scare tactics the BBC used to do with their license fees (unmarked vans driving around looking for unlicensed TV signals) - which is of course bollocks.

They’re interested in the ring leaders, not the punters.
Ah ha got it thanks for that exactly what I wanted to know 👍
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,014
This is about “illegal” streaming of football matches, as a way of circumventing paying for Sky Sports/BT Sport subscriptions. There are also services for movies, PPV events, thousands of channels from around the world. Basically it’s bootlegging, but in HD and for a fraction of the price of one monthly subscription, never mind the ten or so you’d need to get everything these services offer.

The companies (Sky, BT, Peacock et al) lose a lot revenue, so are pretty desperate to shut down the services.

All the police do is, supported by private prosecutions from BigTelly, shut down the services and prosecute the people running it. To try and put people off using these services, they are doing the old scare tactics the BBC used to do with their license fees (unmarked vans driving around looking for unlicensed TV signals) - which is of course bollocks.

They’re interested in the ring leaders, not the punters.
and the Premier League and others. they are the rights owners after all, they determine how the games get shown. if they wanted a free service with all games shown, they could make that happen.
 




sydney

tinky ****in winky
Jul 11, 2003
17,965
town full of eejits
Wouldn’t surprise me if they wasted resources on this kind of thing…
yes its sooooo important ....whilst your prime ministers wife can seemingly waltz away from one bad business after another , owing 100's of thousands of pounds in the process , it is of the utmost importance that if you wish to watch any content on your tv that has any relevance to contemporary life you must pay your dues .....we cannot have corporations being got the better of by the public ....the public is there to fund the jollies of the parliamentarians and their corporate chums.
 




PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
19,595
Hurst Green
Can't be right. NSC's biggest advocate of these services finds it hilarious at my suggestion that his money could be going to organised crime and it is only the "good" money laundering they do. And yet not one person who uses them answered my question as to who they thought their money was going to.
If you don't pay for your stream apart from a VPN which is totally legit are you OK with it? My friend's friend's dog has checked today and it is still working apparently.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here