Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
its not "muddled", its an outright contradiction. there's other policy issues they do this on too. i'm surprised the No campaign didn't make more of this, the practical implications and outcomes, rather than move onto emotional ground where i don't think they have a strong suit.
I think tactically at least, they've been weary of the accusation of scare-mongering. The Yes campaign has been careful not to get drawn into factual specifics, and when the No campaign has, I think it's been seen as negativity which is why they moved to more emotional ground where actually this is being fought.
In some ways this has been a sensible approach. Why should the No campaign outline what will happen if they vote Yes - instead, campaign for what will happen after a No vote, and the importance of the Union which I think they've been doing fairly well since the almighty kick up the backsides they got 2 or 3 weeks ago.