Do you like iron-on sponsorship logos?

[B.H.A. Brady]

:gossip:

 

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

They look a bit cheapo on a forty quid shirt, and get grubby, and crack and peel. Apart from that, they're just fine.

 

[surrey jim]

get damaged in the wash/iron

 

[Basil Fawlty]

Get damaged through the wash, so really are tacky and cheap.

 

[Lush]

Are you implying that the shirt sponsorship deal is going to be all last minute and that?

 

[surrey jim]

Are you implying that the shirt sponsorship deal is going to be all last minute and that?

well skint was 9 years and iron on!!

 

[Beach Hut]

Tacky and the reason why I never bother anymore with BHAFC football shirts - last one I bought was Palookerville

 

[Frutos]

well skint was 9 years and iron on!!

To be fair, it has only been iron-on since the Albiontina shirt, up to and including the play-off shirt, the logo was incorporated into the shirt.

 

[Don Tmatter]

As long as its not DIY iron on

 

[Mendoza]

every kit for every team has an iron on sponsor, so whats the problem, we could be a joke like MIllwall who had their new kit, ironed on all their sponsors, and the sponsors pull out, leaving lots of useless shirts

 

[Herr Tubthumper]

every kit for every team has an iron on sponsor, so whats the problem, we could be a joke like MIllwall who had their new kit, ironed on all their sponsors, and the sponsors pull out, leaving lots of useless shirts

For 40 odd quid one deserves a lot better. Why not get an embroidered or sew-on logo? These can be sewn on as and when the sponsorship deal is decided therefore removing the issue of 'useless shirts'

 

[Lady Whistledown]

Sorry, but you won't get an embroidered or sew on logo for a forty quid kit.

The only people who get sewn on badges etc are the team.

 

[Twinkle Toes]

They'd be ok if you could iron 'em off as well. But you can't: so they arent

 

[jmsc]

every kit for every team has an iron on sponsor, so whats the problem, we could be a joke like MIllwall who had their new kit, ironed on all their sponsors, and the sponsors pull out, leaving lots of useless shirts

Bollocks! The Skint centenary shirt didn't - I haven't bought one since because the
quality of the iron on sponsors label is cheap and nasty.

 

[Beach Hut]

Bollocks! The Skint centenary shirt didn't - I haven't bought one since because the
quality of the iron on sponsors label is cheap and nasty.

Exactly what I have said all along as these current shirts are just tacky, cheap but charged at the same price as previous quality ones.

Still I am sure the club know best on all things commercial.

 

[Stinkers Bridge]

I love them. In fact I wish you could buy just the iron-on sponsors logo without actually having to buy the shirt. That would be the best.

 

[Mendoza]

I love them. In fact I wish you could buy just the iron-on sponsors logo without actually having to buy the shirt. That would be the best.

you ACTUALLY can, maybe put one on the back of your suit? or even on your PJ's?

 

[Emily's Mum]

Anything that isn't contained within the fabric of the shirt can rub against your chest if it's too thick. Some of us have very delicate chests

 

[Mendoza]

do you reckon two big golden arches will look silly on green and black stripes

 

[Stinkers Bridge]

you ACTUALLY can, maybe put one on the back of your suit? or even on your PJ's?

I want to just iron it onto my chest.