The Large One
Who's Next?
Lansley rejects Jamie's dinners
The Jamie Oliver-approach will not work in tackling public health problems like obesity and smoking, the health secretary says. Andrew Lansley told the British Medical Association conference in Brighton there must be an evidence-based approach to dealing with public health. Mr Lansley said people needed to take responsibility for their own health.
He warned lecturing people often ended up being counter-productive.
"If we are constantly lecturing people and trying to tell them what to do, we will actually find that we undermine and are counterproductive in the results that we achieve," said the health secretary, who has pledged to rename the Department of Health the Department of Public Health. He said the TV chef's approach to school food had not had the desired effect - the number of children eating school meals had gone down instead of up.
"Jamie Oliver, quite rightly, was talking about trying to improve the diet of children in schools and improving school meals, but the net effect was the number of children eating school meals in many of these places didn't go up, it went down. So then the schools said 'It's OK to bring packed lunches but we've got to determine what's in the packed lunches, we've got to decide what's in the packed lunches.'
"To which the parents' response was that they gave children money and children are actually spending more money outside school, buying snacks in local shops, instead of on school lunches."
He said then people had said shops near schools must be banned, adding: "Actually, where do we end up with this?"
Mr Lansley said the consumption of salty foods could be reduced but none of this would work unless people's behaviour changed.
He is expected to outline in detail how he plans to do this later this year in a public health strategy paper. He has also pledged to ring-fence public health budgets, saying in the past that they have been raided during times when money is scarce.
Notwithstanding Jamie Oliver is a bit of a big-tongued gimpboy, I thought his programme of trying to educate people about food seemed quite worthwhile, especially in the face of some parents insisting their children eat junk. It would be interesting to see how this government can turn around the culture of children not eating healthy food without feeling they're lecturing parents, because I feel some parents do need bollocking about this.
The Jamie Oliver-approach will not work in tackling public health problems like obesity and smoking, the health secretary says. Andrew Lansley told the British Medical Association conference in Brighton there must be an evidence-based approach to dealing with public health. Mr Lansley said people needed to take responsibility for their own health.
He warned lecturing people often ended up being counter-productive.
"If we are constantly lecturing people and trying to tell them what to do, we will actually find that we undermine and are counterproductive in the results that we achieve," said the health secretary, who has pledged to rename the Department of Health the Department of Public Health. He said the TV chef's approach to school food had not had the desired effect - the number of children eating school meals had gone down instead of up.
"Jamie Oliver, quite rightly, was talking about trying to improve the diet of children in schools and improving school meals, but the net effect was the number of children eating school meals in many of these places didn't go up, it went down. So then the schools said 'It's OK to bring packed lunches but we've got to determine what's in the packed lunches, we've got to decide what's in the packed lunches.'
"To which the parents' response was that they gave children money and children are actually spending more money outside school, buying snacks in local shops, instead of on school lunches."
He said then people had said shops near schools must be banned, adding: "Actually, where do we end up with this?"
Mr Lansley said the consumption of salty foods could be reduced but none of this would work unless people's behaviour changed.
He is expected to outline in detail how he plans to do this later this year in a public health strategy paper. He has also pledged to ring-fence public health budgets, saying in the past that they have been raided during times when money is scarce.
Notwithstanding Jamie Oliver is a bit of a big-tongued gimpboy, I thought his programme of trying to educate people about food seemed quite worthwhile, especially in the face of some parents insisting their children eat junk. It would be interesting to see how this government can turn around the culture of children not eating healthy food without feeling they're lecturing parents, because I feel some parents do need bollocking about this.