pastafarian
Well-known member
quietly signs up for the Everton database now just in case.
how about making them equal to every other season ticket holder when it comes to away games and "attended loyalty" ........apart from the money they pump regarding home fixtures what makes them special in the context of away games?.....thats right........nothing.
Unfortunately modern football values money over pretty much everything else.
The reality is sinking in.
Spoken as a STH who goes to a few away games (furthest Wigan in October). Like I said, LP works well but would like it to atleast give the wider support base some hope of getting Premier League away live action.Spoken like a non-STH who doesn't do Championship aways. I would not be happy if we went to say, Bournemouth on the last day with something riding on the fixture and I missed out on attending because people won tickets in a ballot
It's a new season, new and very different division to any we have played in before, so there is a chance for the club to revisit the loyalty points scheme which is weighted heavily in 1901ers favour. Let's see.
how about making them equal to every other season ticket holder when it comes to away games and "attended loyalty" ........apart from the money they pump regarding home fixtures what makes them special in the context of away games?.....thats right........nothing.
As you state the money they are putting in over a 5 year period for home games, which is more expensive than the home season ticket.
Whether 100 points is right or wrong is immaterial, given they are making that level of commitment, I think it's fair they should get something.
Perhaps as has been pointed out if season ticket holders tie themselves in for 5 years, they should also receive some sort of benefit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's a new season, new and very different division to any we have played in before, so there is a chance for the club to revisit the loyalty points scheme which is weighted heavily in 1901ers favour. Let's see.
This isn't the debate though. It's the level of benefit. A 1901er with no away games has higher priority than a regular ST holder who repeatedly goes to 10 always. Doesn't seem fair.
As you state the money they are putting in over a 5 year period for home games, which is more expensive than the home season ticket.
Whether 100 points is right or wrong is immaterial, given they are making that level of commitment, I think it's fair they should get something.
Perhaps as has been pointed out if season ticket holders tie themselves in for 5 years, they should also receive some sort of benefit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[MENTION=6886]Bozza[/MENTION]'s example suggests a 1901er with no away games can be ahead of a regular ST who regularly attends 10 aways. If I have misunderstood this I apologise. But if it's correct it does seem unfair and weighted heavily in favour of 1901ers irrespective of cash paid or length of commitment. No aways games versus 10...and Mr/Mrs 10 might miss out to someone going to their first away at Old Trafford.Heavily? Depends on your definition, I guess. 50 of the 100 point differential is because home cup games are included (the club already valued the inclusion of home cup games at 50 when they introduced the "Gold" ST). Ever since 1901 was introduced, the club has valued some combination of a five year commitment and the extra cash at 30 LP, as 1901ers originally had 1030 points v 1000. This differential doesn't seem extortionate - surely a five year commitment, irrespective of which division we're playing in is some form of "loyalty". Sure, we can argue how many LP a 5 year commitment is "worth" in terms of "loyalty", but surely that value is greater than zero?
What does seem iniquitous is the 20 additional LP that appeared from nowhere (the difference between 1080 and 1100). Hence my suggestion that the 1901 LP should lie somewhere between 1060 (valuing the 5 year commitment at 10 LP) and 1080 (maintaining the differential which had existed since 1901 was introduced at 30, and valuing the 5 year commitment at 30 LP).
Again, heavily?
Heavily? Depends on your definition, I guess. 50 of the 100 point differential is because home cup games are included (the club already valued the inclusion of home cup games at 50 when they introduced the "Gold" ST). Ever since 1901 was introduced, the club has valued some combination of a five year commitment and the extra cash at 30 LP, as 1901ers originally had 1030 points v 1000. This differential doesn't seem extortionate - surely a five year commitment, irrespective of which division we're playing in is some form of "loyalty". Sure, we can argue how many LP a 5 year commitment is "worth" in terms of "loyalty", but surely that value is greater than zero?
What does seem iniquitous is the 20 additional LP that appeared from nowhere (the difference between 1080 and 1100). Hence my suggestion that the 1901 LP should lie somewhere between 1060 (valuing the 5 year commitment at 10 LP) and 1080 (maintaining the differential which had existed since 1901 was introduced at 30, and valuing the 5 year commitment at 30 LP).
Again, heavily?
This is utter bollocks
The annual season ticket holder is just as loyal as the 5 year season ticket 1901 holder. The ability to afford 1901 does not make you more special than someone on direct monthly debit for one season.
The issue is about loyalty points, money should not buy extra loyalty points.......this is wrong.
Perhaps as has been pointed out if season ticket holders tie themselves in for 5 years, they should also receive some sort of benefit.