BensGrandad
New member
Not making anything up just asking a simple straight forward question could this be why we have bought Dixon when he would appear to be not what is needed.
Not making anything up just asking a simple straight forward question could this be why we have bought Dixon when he would appear to be not what is needed.
Not making anything up just asking a simple straight forward question could this be why we have bought Dixon when he would appear to be not what is needed.
I think it is what is known in the trade as 'COVER'.
You miss the point. Yes it is cover but do we need cover when a more pressing need is to supply the front men with the crosses. It has been reported Murray is an old fashioned type centre forward, so he needs crosses into the box. As we are skint would it not make sense to have spent the £55k on somebody to provide those crosses, unless there is another reason to bring in Dixon, which is what I am asking for views on.
You miss the point. Yes it is cover but do we need cover when a more pressing need is to supply the front men with the crosses. It has been reported Murray is an old fashioned type centre forward, so he needs crosses into the box. As we are skint would it not make sense to have spent the £55k on somebody to provide those crosses, unless there is another reason to bring in Dixon, which is what I am asking for views on.
i know him quite well!
hes 1 of ma bros m8s and i remember wen he signed 4 wycombe and he scored about 6 goals in 7!
although i know him, i hav 2 admit dat he is nowhere near good enough 4 brighton.
normally all of us as fans would be RIPPING into a STRIKER with long hair, an alice band and white boots, so what do we do now that we have spent money on someone with all said characteristics??