mcshane in the 79th
New member
- Nov 4, 2005
- 10,485
What does that even MEAN? Your brain controls your feet, last time I checked.
It means he may try clever through balls and passes but they don't often work. Not that hard to understand is it?
What does that even MEAN? Your brain controls your feet, last time I checked.
How can ANYONE answer Dicker? seriously, look at his stats, for a central midfielder they are very poor.
It means he may try clever through balls and passes but they don't often work. Not that hard to understand is it?
Navarro is a tidy player sitting in front of the back four breaking up play and laying decent passes out to our more forward players, he came from the Anfield acadamy and you cn tell in a way with his passing range.
He has also improved in the 5-4-1 formation
Dicker is one of those midfielders that it is difficult to place as he is not defensive or ultra-attacking either but I rate him as he wins lots of lost causes and has bundles of energy, he may struggle next season for a starting place though, especially if Poyet signs a flairniac palyer.
What about try to pirouette with the ball and losing it vs Orient and Villa that both lead to us conceding goals? And if he was that good, as the creative central midfielder that he is supposed to be, why doesn't he have more assists?But you can't make a stat that takes into account dropping a shoulder and completely wrongfooting 3 opposing midfielders, can you?
Well to me that suggests he tries to do a bit more than just knocking it to the person nearest to him.
A predictably pointless poll.
A question where there's an OBVIOUS favourite (i.e. the one who has spectacularly won over NSC with his recent form), and it just happens to be the person that the idiot starting the thread decided was his favourite player only last week, and has been getting himself off over it all week.
It proves nothing, they are both different players with different qualities. I'm pleased that people can now recognise Navarro's talents as opposed to slating him because he's not Dicker, and equally pleased that most people have realised that Dicker is perhaps not the Beckenbauer many were making out at the beginning of the season. But for god sake don't now start slating Dicker simply because he's not Navarro.
They are both decent enough players. Not amazing, not shit - somewhere in between.
Stupid polls like this aren't going to change that.
Nicely summed up. I agree if we stay 4-5-1 then Dicker will be the one that gets replaced for the simple fact that he doesn't create or score anywhere near enough goals.
What about try to pirouette with the ball and losing it vs Orient and Villa that both lead to us conceding goals? And if he was that good, as the creative central midfielder that he is supposed to be, why doesn't he have more assists?
I'm not having a go, because I actually like Dicker but I don't believe he deserves a lot of the praise he receives from people. Just my opinion like.
It proves nothing, they are both different players with different qualities. I'm pleased that people can now recognise Navarro's talents as opposed to slating him because he's not Dicker, and equally pleased that most people have realised that Dicker is perhaps not the Beckenbauer many were making out at the beginning of the season. But for god sake don't now start slating Dicker simply because he's not Navarro.
Is that how you judge people - their stats?
Bloody hell.
He creates more than Crofts, while having played deeper for 70% of the season.
A predictably pointless poll.
A question where there's an OBVIOUS favourite (i.e. the one who has spectacularly won over NSC with his recent form), and it just happens to be the person that the idiot starting the thread decided was his favourite player only last week, and has been getting himself off over it all week.
It proves nothing, they are both different players with different qualities. I'm pleased that people can now recognise Navarro's talents as opposed to slating him because he's not Dicker, and equally pleased that most people have realised that Dicker is perhaps not the Beckenbauer many were making out at the beginning of the season. But for god sake don't now start slating Dicker simply because he's not Navarro.
They are both decent enough players. Not amazing, not shit - somewhere in between.
Stupid polls like this aren't going to change that.
Withdean Wanker strikes again.
Clearly there is not an actual favourite is there? They are obviously different players and they obviously have different qualities, however in a 4-4-2 they would both be fighting for the same spot, therefore it is perfectly valid to have this follow on poll and to discuss their good and bad points.
Over the entire season Dicker has been the better player. Still rate them both fairly highly, but Navarro was genuinely woeful early on in the season.