Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,265
The share offer wasn't in the manuscript the club asked to see. I am not saying that the club was being reasonable or unreasonable in asking to see it, or that DK was being reasonable or unreasonable in saying no. I'm just giving the facts. I absolutely agree with you that there is nothing in the book that should have stopped the club selling it, but that was its decision.
Fair enough.
It's sad that Dick has tainted his legacy like this, it's minor stuff of course and it doesn't take away from the crucial stuff he achieved with the help of Perry and the board. I suppose in a way it's a demonstration of his bloody-mindedness, that same characteristic without which the club would never have been able to haul itself back on it's feet.