BensGrandad
New member
Not shit stirring at all as I am sure that I have read it that he has been repaid most of his original investment. As many have said there is nothing to say that the Chairman must use his own money and there is nothing to say that other people cannot put in more. If you care to remember my biggest beef against DK originally, was that he didnt have sufficient money to carry as forward and was then told that he didnt need to have money. I think that he has done a very good job as chairman taking everything into account but why do people keep on about his money whether it be an abundance or lack of. Provided somebody on the board or close to it is keeping us a float does it matter who it is.