Billy the Fish
Technocrat
You think a women can forget being wronged 20 years back....... you must be a young un Billy.
Bugger, kind of blows that one out the water doesn't it.
You think a women can forget being wronged 20 years back....... you must be a young un Billy.
In the main i'd pretty much say thats the case, but i'd lean more to the side of blacks imagining discrimination, there isnt a s much positive discriminatin here as in the states for example.So employment discrimination only exists towards white people and any employment discrimination towards ethnic minorities is imagined?
In the main i'd pretty much say thats the case, but i'd lean more to the side of blacks imagining discrimination, there isnt a s much positive discriminatin here as in the states for example.
Sadly for you i'm not trolling, you really think that people are discriminated AGAINST in the job mkt due to being black ?I'm disappointed in you Bushy, you can troll more subtly than that. You just don't put in the effort any any more.
Sadly for you i'm not trolling, you really think that people are discriminated AGAINST in the job mkt due to being black ?
Are you inferring it wasnt ? what was the job ? how many went for the job , how many black candidates were there ?My son went for a job - they had a recruitment day with a series of tasks. All the black candidates were dropped during the course of the day. Could be co-incidence.
Are you inferring it wasnt ? what was the job ? how many went for the job , how many black candidates were there ?
I never, ever, have a prioblem keeping a straight face with your posts.See now you're getting more convincing Bushy. Stick to the argument and keep a straight face and someone might bite. It would help if you hadn't picked such a silly statement in the first place though.
Exactly, immediately the inference is that it was race related , as you say it was a telesales job, whereabouts was the job ? If it was sussex , lets assume 30 went for it, they picked ten and out of the 30 there were 3 blacks who didnt get picked, why would that be so suspicious ? assuming those sort of numbers are similar to the actual ones.My son described it. It was a tele-sales type job. I think they recruited ten - and I am not sure how many they started with.
I have no proof that was the case - to my son it looked a bit suspicious. But it may have been done on telephone manner and qualifications.
I would think it goes on. I would think in other situations it may be easier if you are from a minority. Would it be such a shock ?
Exactly, immediately the inference is that it was race related , as you say it was a telesales job, whereabouts was the job ? If it was sussex , lets assume 30 went for it, they picked ten and out of the 30 there were 3 blacks who didnt get picked, why would that be so suspicious ? assuming those sort of numbers are similar to the actual ones.
Well we'll never know, who can say for certain, it does strike me that people who are brought up in the country seem to be super sensitive on race issues , sometimes even to the point of being embarassed about even saying the word black, this isnt meant as a dig, just as an observation, anyway i'm out of here soon , have a good weekend !Well it was London as it happens. I do not know the breakdown - it seemed race related to my lad.
Its not nonsense at all,blacks like i said many times are well protected in our society and this government for some daft reason seem petrified of being called racist.Nonsense.
Have I completely imagined it but didn't Baron Taylor of Warwick get imprisoned for fiddling his expenses ?
Hardly as serious but Keith Vaz was also suspended from the House of Commons.
And Diane Abbott never struck me as the sharpest pencil in the case. Credit to her for arriving in the corridors of Westminster though.
I disagree. She said that all white people are colonialists, greedy people who like to divide and rule in order to exploit and steal the wealth of other countries. That's not a nice characteristic, but its what white people do. Abbott thinks whites are inherently morally inferior to blacks.
That is a very reasoned argument - but I disagree, I don't think it needs a 'scoundrels' caveat at all for it to be a moral judgment. The moral inference was quite clear, especially given Abbott's 'previous' in the field of race relations. We're the baddies, she's made that plain.It cannot be deduced from her tweets alone whether Diane Abbott thinks whites are inherently morally inferior for blacks. It can't for the simple reason that Abbott was not having a morality conversation with Bim Adewunmi. If she had said something along the lines of "white people love playing 'divide and rule'. The scoundrels will never change", I would entirely agree with you because that would be a morality conversation. Instead, what is moral or not formed no part of Abbott's judgement.
She went into a very different direction, one where moral labels such as right, wrong, good, bad and evil did not come into play. In her tweets she was concerning herself purely with what was effective. This included suggesting that black people not make themselves vulnerable to winning strategies such as divide and rule. As a further sign that morality formed no basis of her consideration, she even advocated being less than open and truthful about political divisions as a contributing factor to producing results ("ethnic communities that show more public solidarity & unity than black people do much better #dontwashdirtylineninpublic").
In short: no morality conversation means she's not making any moral judgements on any race.
.........properly grateful........