Diane Abbott in fine form this morning...

[Bold Seagull]

So presumably you are saying there are more children than before so spending should be increased accordingly? If there hasn't been any increase in birth rate then is this down to immigration? If so then it is not really a cut in funding but an inevitable consequence of other policies.

Read the IFS link, why ask a question of a poster when your answer is in the link they provided?

 

[Bold Seagull]

im glad you agree he made her so called facts about the uber rich and the 1% ers look ridiculous
we could use more honesty and not fake news from the ultra left on this issue

And posting a Fox News clip is your answer to combatting fake news and honesty!?

 

[pastafarian]

And posting a Fox News clip is your answer to combatting fake news and honesty!?

Again, another one with no clue how to give a counter argument
which arguments that he puts forward are lies?........im waiting

you lot are more interested as always in the source than the substance.

 

[drew]

im glad you agree he made her so called facts about the uber rich and the 1% ers look ridiculous
we could use more honesty and not fake news from the ultra left on this issue

But do you not think the uber rich couldn't afford to contribute more than they do?

This government seem hell bent on reducing the burden on the rich but are quite happy to pass that burden onto the poorer sections.

 

[pastafarian]

But do you not think the uber rich couldn't afford to contribute more than they do?

This government seem hell bent on reducing the burden on the rich but are quite happy to pass that burden onto the poorer sections.

Not according to the students model of 90% tax or when she said 100% was getting near her preferred socialist model.........that is clearly mental and i take it you didnt listen to the whole video

 

[Neville's Breakfast]

Have you got a link that shows no increase in the birth rate then?

No I haven't as I didn't say there hasn't been. I am having a conversation with you and wondered if you knew.

 

[Neville's Breakfast]

Read the IFS link, why ask a question of a poster when your answer is in the link they provided?

Sorry mate, I don't read all the links people post on NSC. I was just having a chat. No need to be so defensive.
I wonder if the move to compulsory post 16 education plays a part. There are many students in sixth form education who would have left school at 16 in previous decades. There are certainly many other factors at play than the Tory cuts narrative.

 

[Scotchegg]

Not according to the students model of 90% tax or when she said 100% was getting near her preferred socialist model.........that is clearly mental and i take it you didnt listen to the whole video

100% is clearly mental and not even nearly a representative opinion. Why have you even posted this again? Anyway, it's fox, I thought you lot didn't trust the MAINSTREAM MEDIA!! Or does fox not count?

 

[pastafarian]

100% is clearly mental and not even nearly a representative opinion. Why have you even posted this again? Anyway, it's fox, I thought you lot didn't trust the MAINSTREAM MEDIA!! Or does fox not count?

Anyway its fox?
Again another one avoiding the context.and concentrating on the source
What was he saying that was a lie?............im waiting

 

[drew]

Not according to the students model of 90% tax or when she said 100% was getting near her preferred socialist model.........that is clearly mental and i take it you didnt listen to the whole video

I did listen to the whole video and she didn't suggest the 90% rate, the reporter did. The reporter also was the one trying to suggest they would all leave the country. We've seen similar things said here as we approach elections but I'm not sure there is any evidence to confirm that actually happens.

That said, where did I say they should contribute 90% or are you just trying to muddy the waters as you don't want to answer? All I said is that they could contribute more than they currently do. That could be raising top level of income tax, changing our low corporate tax rate (possibly have a two tiered system that protects small businesses).

 

[Bold Seagull]

im glad you agree he made her so called facts about the uber rich and the 1% ers look ridiculous
we could use more honesty and not fake news from the ultra left on this issue

And posting a Fox News clip is your answer to combatting fake news and honesty!?

 

[pastafarian]

I did listen to the whole video and she didn't suggest the 90% rate, the reporter did. The reporter also was the one trying to suggest they would all leave the country. We've seen similar things said here as we approach elections but I'm not sure there is any evidence to confirm that actually happens.

That said, where did I say they should contribute 90% or are you just trying to muddy the waters as you don't want to answer? All I said is that they could contribute more than they currently do. That could be raising top level of income tax, changing our low corporate tax rate (possibly have a two tiered system that protects small businesses).

I never said you did say that
bit early to play the lying victim card

 

[pastafarian]

And posting a Fox News clip is your answer to combatting fake news and honesty!?

Its possible to post any news clip to see the truth whether its CNN MSNBC BBC FOX.RT SKY CH4

The source does not make it true or false, only the content makes it true or false.
This is one of the major flaws of the left, they see a source and dismiss it like a child in a playground argument....its quite pathetic

 

[drew]

I never said you did say that
bit early to play the lying victim card

So why mention it when I asked whether the rich should pay more than they currently do?

You make stupid comments about the 'ultra left' but post irrelevant videos from a right wing news station.

You don't answer comments raised so the only conclusion is probably that you are either just fishing for a reaction or you actually don't have an answer.

 

[pastafarian]

So why mention it when I asked whether the rich should pay more than they currently do?

You make stupid comments about the 'ultra left' but post irrelevant videos from a right wing news station.

You don't answer comments raised so the only conclusion is probably that you are either just fishing for a reaction or you actually don't have an answer.

the views are not irrelevant......you just chose to ignore the views for some reason.....
its really easy......where is the bloke lying in the video.............none of you have come back to me yet.......not one.....not even you......what was he saying was a lie?

 

[Scotchegg]

the views are not irrelevant......you just chose to ignore the views for some reason.....
its really easy......where is the bloke lying in the video.............none of you have come back to me yet.......not one.....not even you......what was he saying was a lie?

The clip has nothing to do with anything, you even said it yourself "it's not UK relevant". Why are you posting it in a thread about the UK General election then? You're so far gone is not even worth bothering.

 

[LamieRobertson]

Quite nice out today

 

[Bold Seagull]

im glad you agree he made her so called facts about the uber rich and the 1% ers look ridiculous
we could use more honesty and not fake news from the ultra left on this issue

Its possible to post any news clip to see the truth whether its CNN MSNBC BBC FOX.RT SKY CH4

The source does not make it true or false, only the content makes it true or false.
This is one of the major flaws of the left, they see a source and dismiss it like a child in a playground argument....its quite pathetic

You're major flaw is you get too angry too quickly.

I wasn't commenting on the content of the piece, I was commenting on your statement highlighted in bold. You asked for more honesty, and not fake news from the left, and you did that by posting arguably one of the biggest exponents of mistruths, fake news etc. from the right, Fox News. If you cannot see the hypocrisy of that, well, you are lost in your own arguments.

Sources are not the same. It is worth discriminating against press and media you feel promote fake news, right or left, if you really feel that strongly about honesty and truth.

 

[pastafarian]

The clip has nothing to do with anything, you even said it yourself "it's not UK relevant". Why are you posting it in a thread about the UK General election then? You're so far gone is not even worth bothering.

its not UK relevant but relevant to the general fake news lies surrounding the 1% ers globally pushed by the lefties......hope that helps
anyway still no reply as to why he is lying.......says it all.

 

[pastafarian]

You're major flaw is you get too angry too quickly.

I wasn't commenting on the content of the piece, I was commenting on your statement highlighted in bold. You asked for more honesty, and not fake news from the left, and you did that by posting arguably one of the biggest exponents of mistruths, fake news etc. from the right, Fox News. If you cannot see the hypocrisy of that, well, you are lost in your own arguments.

Sources are not the same. It is worth discriminating against press and media you feel promote fake news, right or left, if you really feel that strongly about honesty and truth.

excellent
feel free to now comment on the content of the video
where was he lying?

why are you all playing the evasive card?