Describe Keith Andrews in one word

[Rookie]

Pedestrian

 

[spring hall convert]

overthehill

 

[garethjamesuk]

Basic

 

[garethjamesuk]

Lazy

 

[porkypie]

Pony

 

[Mike Small]

To everyone who is saying stop blaming him for being the scapegoat and that he is not worse than other players. What does he actually do?! He does not protect the defence or tackle, he does not score goals, he does not play through balls, he does not go past players etc etc. His job is the easiest in the team. The reasons everyone says eh 'wasn't as bad as so and so' is because he's not expected to score goals, go past people, play people in, stop their attacking midfielder. Stop making excuses, he,s very very poor and we are a better team without him than we are with him.

 

[sllugaes]

If we are going to pick on Andrews - who today passed well, was passionate, positioning was good, and appeared hungry to win for someone on loan. People on here must realise he is not a free running probing forward midfielder with pace, nor is lopez, JFC, and a lesser extent stephens. He plays his type of game well, experienced, Sitting, neat & tidy, ticking, and does what he does well. He is not in the team, to score a number if goals from midfield, although who is? Yes crofts was playing well, although even though we lost him, he would not have made a difference with results.
Lets start a thread describing weaknesses re buckley, JFC, (ray wilkins), Lualua etc etc, why pick on Andrews ---- pathectic.
Scapegoat.

 

[Mike Small]

If we are going to pick on Andrews - who today passed well, was passionate, positioning was good, and appeared hungry to win for someone on loan. People on here must realise he is not a free running probing forward midfielder with pace, nor is lopez, JFC, and a lesser extent stephens. He plays his type of game well, experienced, Sitting, neat & tidy, ticking, and does what he does well. He is not in the team, to score a number if goals from midfield, although who is? Yes crofts was playing well, although even though we lost him, he would not have made a difference with results.
Lets start a thread describing weaknesses re buckley, JFC, (ray wilkins), Lualua etc etc, why pick on Andrews ---- pathectic.
Scapegoat.

Pathetic? We have won 20% of the games he plays compared to 75% when he doesn,t. He plays a 'sitting role, nice and tidy' - how does that help the team you moron? I would rather have Buckley, UFC or Lua lua in the team because they are able to have a positive impact.

 

[Silk]

If we are going to pick on Andrews - who today passed well, was passionate, positioning was good, and appeared hungry to win for someone on loan. People on here must realise he is not a free running probing forward midfielder with pace, nor is lopez, JFC, and a lesser extent stephens. He plays his type of game well, experienced, Sitting, neat & tidy, ticking, and does what he does well. He is not in the team, to score a number if goals from midfield, although who is? Yes crofts was playing well, although even though we lost him, he would not have made a difference with results.
Lets start a thread describing weaknesses re buckley, JFC, (ray wilkins), Lualua etc etc, why pick on Andrews ---- pathectic.
Scapegoat.

100% this. Andrews knows his job and does it effectively. Certain others who made a pigs ear of it would be more fitting targets for abuse if that's what floats your boat.

 

[World of Sport]

Infuriating.

 

[BensGrandad]

Underated.

He gets through a lot of work and plays some good balls that the rest of our midfielders coukd learn from and do well to copy.

 

[sllugaes]

UFC! Already have andrews and ince, jfc too light weight.
Think you miss understood i was basically indicating lets pick on any of the players i.e buckley lualua for example.
Agree lualua is positive, does not always know what he will do with the ball, and end result is sometimes poor, although makes things happen, and pressures the away teams defence as you know.
Oh i am not a moron, like you i have an opinion.

 

[El Sid]

uninspiring

 

[Poyningsgull]

Unwanted

 

[Baldseagull]

Ordinary.

 

[Trelford Mills Guide Dog]

Well-endowed

 

[The Truth]

Sexy

 

[blue'n'white]

Slow

 

[Common as Mook]

Meh

 

[HawkTheSeagull]

Decent

And 1 word for my opinion - controversial.