Your definition of hypnotism is, to my mind, a bit off. ‘Involuntary hypnotism’ is a contradiction of a sort, people who go up on stage are voluntarily putting themselves forward for hypnosis whilst at the same time being of the suggestible type. Yes, hypnosis requires a co-operation but also how do you explain the non-verbal instructions that someone like Derren incorporates, such as the touching of the participants neck and wrists?What’s great is that everyone can enjoy it, even if you know how it’s done. He performs with such artistry.
The majority of stuff about his ability to influence is true, but not in the way people think it is. Involuntary hypnotism doesn’t exist. Hypnotism relies on being willing to cooperate; one is fully conscious during the experience, most of the time it lowers inhibitions because people’s desire to believe forces other than their own desire to please and entertain are at hand.
He uses a technique called “instant stooging” frequently. That’s technically influencing people!
Brilliant entertainer and clever man, but everything is a lot more simple in execution than most people realise. It just takes preparation, practice and skill.
The guy who put the card in the box was not told to put the card in the box. Also, he had no recollection of having done so. Just like the guy who mimicked Derren, he wasn’t instructed to do so.
Your definition of instant stooging also misses the mark, as far as I understand it. Instant stooging requires the participant to simply go along with what the magician claims. A few times, Derren was slightly off, with names for example. Derren isn’t your regular magician, as you know. He’s one of a kind hence the standing that he holds. The mind is far more powerful than we give credit for. Derrens is made more powerful through all the study he has done. The participants unconscious mind is more powerful than he or she understands.